The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The angiotensin II type 2 receptor: an enigma with multiple variations
Abstract
Since it was discovered ten years ago, the angiotensin II (ANG II) type 2 (AT 2) receptor has been an enigma. This receptor binds ANG II with a high affinity but is not responsible for mediating any of the classical physiological actions of this peptide, all of which involve the ANG II type 1 (AT 1) receptor. Furthermore, the AT 2 receptor exhibits dramatic differences in biochemical and functional properties and in patterns of expression compared with the AT 1 receptor. During the past decade, much information has been gathered about the AT 2 receptor, and the steadily increasing number of publications indicates a growing interest in this new and independent area of research. A number of studies suggest a role of AT 2 receptors in brain, renal, and cardiovascular functions and in the processes of apoptosis and tissue regeneration. Despite these advances, nothing stands out as the major singular function of these receptors. The study of AT 2 receptors has reached a crossroads, and innovative approaches must be considered so that unifying mechanisms as to the function of these unique receptors can be put forward. In this review we will discuss the advances that have been made in understanding the biology of the AT 2 receptor. Furthermore, we will consider how these discoveries, along with newer experimental approaches, may eventually lead to the elusive physiological and pathophysiological functions of these receptors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Whitmarsh, A. J., & Davis, R. J. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1007/s001090050063 · Cited by 1,543
Cited by
Touyz, R. M., & Schiffrin, E. L. (2000) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01471-6 · Cited by 934
AGTR2 Mutations in X-Linked Mental Retardation
Vervoort, V. S., Beachem, M. A., Edwards, P. S., Ladd, S., Miller, K. E., de Mollerat, X., Clarkson, K., DuPont, B., Schwartz, C. E., Stevenson, R. E., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072191 · Cited by 721
Wolf, G., & Ritz, E. (2005) · Kidney International · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00145.x · Cited by 289
Daugherty, A., Manning, M. W., & Cassis, L. A. (2001) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704331 · Cited by 289
Angiotensin receptors: signaling, vascular pathophysiology, and interactions with ceramide
Berry, C., Touyz, R., Dominiczak, A. F., Webb, R. C., & Johns, D. G. (2001) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.2001.281.6.h2337 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Gallinat, S., Busche, S., Raizada, M. K., & Sumners, C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- E357-E374
- ISSN
- 0193-1849 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1555
- OpenAlex
- W2182230456
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The angiotensin II type 2 receptor: an enigma with multiple variations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpendo.2000.278.3.e357
- The paper
- Gallinat, S., Busche, S., Raizada, M. K., & Sumners, C. (2000). The angiotensin II type 2 receptor: an enigma with multiple variations. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.2000.278.3.e357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.