Cited by 286Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseGut microbiota and healthPhytochemistry and biological activity of medicinal plants

Ursodeoxycholic acid and lithocholic acid exert anti-inflammatory actions in the colon

Open access
Ward, Joseph B. J., Lajczak, Natalia K., Kelly, Orlaith B., O’Dwyer, Aoife M., Giddam, Ashwini K., Ní Gabhann, Joan, Franco, Placido, Tambuwala, Murtaza M. +4 more·2017·American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) comprise a group of common and debilitating chronic intestinal disorders for which currently available therapies are often unsatisfactory. The naturally occurring secondary bile acid, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), has well-established anti-inflammatory and cytoprotective actions and may therefore be effective in treating IBD. We aimed to investigate regulation of colonic inflammatory responses by UDCA and to determine the potential impact of bacterial metabolism on its therapeutic actions. The anti-inflammatory efficacy of UDCA, a nonmetabolizable analog, 6α-methyl-UDCA (6-MUDCA), and its primary colonic metabolite lithocholic acid (LCA) was assessed in the murine dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) model of mucosal injury. The effects of bile acids on cytokine (TNF-α, IL-6, Il-1β, and IFN-γ) release from cultured colonic epithelial cells and mouse colonic tissue in vivo were investigated. Luminal bile acids were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. UDCA attenuated release of proinflammatory cytokines from colonic epithelial cells in vitro and was protective against the development of colonic inflammation in vivo. In contrast, although 6-MUDCA mimicked the effects of UDCA on epithelial cytokine release in vitro, it was ineffective in preventing inflammation in the DSS model. In UDCA-treated mice, LCA became the most common colonic bile acid. Finally, LCA treatment more potently inhibited epithelial cytokine release and protected against DSS-induced mucosal inflammation than did UDCA. These studies identify a new role for the primary metabolite of UDCA, LCA, in preventing colonic inflammation and suggest that microbial metabolism of UDCA is necessary for the full expression of its protective actions. NEW & NOTEWORTHY On the basis of its cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory actions, the secondary bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has well-established uses in both traditional and Western medicine. We identify a new role for the primary metabolite of UDCA, lithocholic acid, as a potent inhibitor of intestinal inflammatory responses, and we present data to suggest that microbial metabolism of UDCA is necessary for the full expression of its protective effects against colonic inflammation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpgi.00256.2016

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Activation of TGR5 is generally associated with anti-inflammatory effects and protective features towards the intestinal epithelium.

    “Activation of TGR5 has generally been associated with anti-inflammatory effects and protective features towards the intestinal epithelium (Sarathy et al., 2017;Ward et al., 2017).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as Ward et al., 2017

    The available indexed passages are publication metadata and the paper’s title, which identifies anti-inflammatory actions of two bile acids but does not address TGR5 activation or epithelial protection. Searches for TGR5 and bile-acid receptor effects returned no substantive passage establishing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ward, J. B. J., Lajczak, N. K., Kelly, O. B., O’Dwyer, A. M., Giddam, A. K., Ní Gabhann, J., Franco, P., Tambuwala, M. M., Jefferies, C. A., Keely, S., Roda, A., & Keely, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Department of Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland;
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Keely, Stephen J.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
Published
2017-06-01
Volume
312
Issue
6
Pages
G550-G558
ISSN
  • 0193-1857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1547
OpenAlex
W2598445433
Cited by
286
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ulster University Research Portal (Ulster University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) (10/IN.1/B2983)
  • Crohns and Colitis Foundation of America (354322)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry and biological activity of medicinal plants
Keywords
ursodeoxycholic acid, lithocholic acid, bile acids, inflammatory bowel disease, colonic inflammation, anti-inflammatory activity, colonic epithelial cells, inflammatory cytokines, DSS-induced colitis, TNF-α, interleukin-6, IL-1β, interferon-gamma
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Bacteria, Biotransformation, Colitis, Colon, Disease Models, Animal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Lithocholic Acid, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Time Factors, Ursodeoxycholic Acid, Cytokines, Dextran Sulfate, Inflammation Mediators, HT29 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review