The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Opening mechanisms of the human upper esophageal sphincter
Abstract
Our goals in this study were to evaluate the mechanisms operative in swallow-associated opening of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and to determine the dynamics of fluid flow across the sphincter. For this purpose, we obtained concurrent videofluorographic and manometric studies of 2- to 30-ml barium swallows in 15 normal subjects. We found that the resting UES high-pressure zone corresponded closely with the location of the cricopharyngeus. The findings indicated that manometric UES relaxation and anterior hyoid traction on the larynx invariably preceded UES opening. With graded increases in bolus volume, progressive increases occurred in UES diameter, cross-sectional area, flow duration, and transsphincteric flow rate. Intrabolus pressure upstream to the UES and within the UES at its opening during transsphincteric flow of barium remained within a narrow physiological range of less than 10 mmHg up to a bolus volume of 10 ml. With increases in bolus volume, anterior hyoid movement, UES relaxation, and UES opening occurred sooner in the swallow sequence to accommodate the early entry of large boluses into the pharynx. We conclude that during swallowing 1) normal UES opening involves sphincter relaxation, anterior laryngeal traction, and intrabolus pressure, 2) volume-dependent adaptive changes in UES dimension accommodate large bolus volumes and flow rates with minimal requirement for increases in upstream, or intrasphincteric, intrabolus pressure or UES opening duration, and 3) volume-dependent changes in UES dimensions as well as timing of UES relaxation and opening indicate a sensory feedback mechanism that modulates some components of the swallow response generated by the brain stem swallow centers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Previous studies have shown that the important UES events happen slightly after the initial UES opening [22].”
From Upper esophageal sphincter opening segmentation with convolutional recurrent neural networks in high resolution cervical auscultation (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Maximal values of A-P UES diameter were found also to be reached after 70–170 msec of UES opening, depending on the bolus size and other factors [22].”
From Upper esophageal sphincter opening segmentation with convolutional recurrent neural networks in high resolution cervical auscultation (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“For example, in general, entry of the bolus head into the sphincter defines UES opening; however, in 20% of swallows, air precedes entry of the bolus by 30–60 msec [22].”
From Upper esophageal sphincter opening segmentation with convolutional recurrent neural networks in high resolution cervical auscultation (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hao (2015) · doi:10.1002/14651858 · Cited by 11,321
Pharyngeal (Zenker's) diverticulum is a disorder of upper esophageal sphincter opening
Cook, I. J., Gabb, M., Panagopoulos, V., Jamieson, G. G., Dodds, W. J., Dent, J., & Shearman, D. J. (1992) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(92)91508-2 · Cited by 342
Self-citationKhalifa, Y., Donohue, C., Coyle, J. L., & Sejdic, E. (2021) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2020.3000057 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Cook, I. J., Dodds, W. J., Dantas, R. O., Massey, B., Kern, M. K., Lang, I. M., Brasseur, J. G., & Hogan, W. J.
- Affiliations
- Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1989-11-01
- Volume
- 257
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- G748-G759
- ISSN
- 0193-1857 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1547
- OpenAlex
- W1841211243
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 26.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-DK-25731, R01DK025731)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR00058)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
- Keywords
- upper esophageal sphincter, swallowing, cricopharyngeus, bolus volume, intrabolus pressure, sensory feedback, videofluorography, manometry
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Barium, Biomechanical Phenomena, Deglutition, Esophagogastric Junction, Gastrointestinal Transit, Humans, Male, Manometry, Peristalsis, Radiography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review