The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Luminal glucose concentrations in the gut under normal conditions
Abstract
Luminal glucose (Glc) concentrations in the small intestine (SI) are widely assumed to be 50-500 mM. These values have posed problems for interpreting SI luminal osmolality and absorptive capacity, Glc transporter Michaelis-Menten constants (Km), and the physiological role of active Glc transport and its regulation. Hence we measured luminal contents, osmolality, and Glc, Na+, and K+ concentrations in normally feeding rats, rabbits, and dogs. Measured Glc concentrations were compatible with the portion of measured osmolality not accounted for by Na+ and K+ salts, amino acids, and peptides. Mean SI luminal osmolalities were less than or equal to 100 mosmol/kg hypertonic. For animals on the most nearly physiological diets, SI Glc concentrations averaged 0.4-24 mM and ranged with time and SI region from 0.2 to a maximum of 48 mM. The older published very high values are artifacts of direct infusion of concentrated Glc solutions into the gut, nonspecific Glc assays, and failure to test for quantitative recovery or to centrifuge samples in the cold. By storing food after meals and releasing it between meals, rat stomach greatly damps diurnal fluctuations in quantity and osmolality of food reaching the SI and hence also damps fluctuations in absorption rates. These new values for luminal Glc have five important physiological implications: the problem of accounting for apparently very hypertonic SI contents in the face of high osmotic water permeability disappears; the effective Km of the SI Glc transporter is now comparable to prevailing Glc concentrations; the SI no longer appears to have enormous excess absorptive capacity for Glc; regulation of Glc transport by dietary intake now makes functional sense; and the claim that high luminal Glc concentrations permit solvent drag to become the major mode of Glc absorption under normal conditions is undermined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physiology of Proglucagon Peptides: Role of Glucagon and GLP-1 in Health and Disease
Sandoval, D. A., & D'Alessio, D. A. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00013.2014 · Cited by 498
The microbiome of the upper respiratory tract in health and disease
Kumpitsch, C., Koskinen, K., Schöpf, V., & Moissl-Eichinger, C. (2019) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-019-0703-z · Cited by 465
Intestinal permeability: functional assessment and significance
Travis, S., & Menzies, I. (1992) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs0820471 · Cited by 333
Glucose-Sensing in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1-Secreting Cells
Reimann, F., & Gribble, F. M. (2002) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.51.9.2757 · Cited by 292
Drozdowski, L. (2006) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v12.i11.1657 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferraris, R. P., Yasharpour, S., Lloyd, K. C., Mirzayan, R., & Diamond, J. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1990-11-01
- Volume
- 259
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- G822-G837
- ISSN
- 0193-1857 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1547
- OpenAlex
- W2144449002
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Luminal glucose concentrations in the gut under normal conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpgi.1990.259.5.g822
- The paper
- Ferraris, R. P., Yasharpour, S., Lloyd, K. C., Mirzayan, R., & Diamond, J. M. (1990). Luminal glucose concentrations in the gut under normal conditions. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1990.259.5.g822
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.