Cited by 502Gastrointestinal motility and disordersRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFood composition and properties

Effect of meal viscosity and nutrients on satiety, intragastric dilution, and emptying assessed by MRI

Marciani, Luca, Gowland, Penny A., Spiller, Robin C., Manoj, Pretima, Moore, Rachel J., Young, Paul, Fillery-Travis, Annette J.·2001·American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology

Abstract

The relationship between the intragastric distribution, dilution, and emptying of meals and satiety was studied using noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging techniques in 12 healthy subjects with four polysaccharide test meals of varying viscosity and nutrient content as follows: 1) low-viscosity nonnutrient, 2) low-viscosity nutrient, 3) high-viscosity nonnutrient, and 4) high-viscosity nutrient. Increasing the nutrient content of the high-viscosity meal delayed gastric emptying from 46 ± 9 to 76 ± 6 min ( P < 0.004), whereas increasing viscosity had a smaller effect. The volume of secretions within the stomach 60 min after ingestion was higher for the high-viscosity nutrient meal ( P < 0.04). A simple model to calculate the total volume of secretion added to the test meal is presented. Color-coded dilution map images showed the heterogeneous process of progressive gastric dilution of high-viscosity meals, whereas low-viscosity meals were uniformly diluted. Fullness was found to be linearly related to total gastric volumes for the nutrient meals ( R 2= 0.98) and logarithmically related for the nonnutrient meals ( R 2= 0.96). Fullness was higher for high- compared with low-viscosity meals ( P < 0.02), and with the nutrient meals this was associated with greater antral volumes ( P < 0.05).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpgi.2001.280.6.g1227

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marciani, L., Gowland, P. A., Spiller, R. C., Manoj, P., Moore, R. J., Young, P., & Fillery-Travis, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Division of Gastroenterology, Queen's Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham NG7 2UH; and
  • Quadram Institute (GB)
  • Institute of Food Research, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UA, United Kingdom
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
Published
2001-06-01
Volume
280
Issue
6
Pages
G1227-G1233
ISSN
  • 0193-1857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1547
OpenAlex
W2128249820
Cited by
502
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 35
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
satiety, gastric emptying, gastric secretion, nutrient content
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Food, Gastric Emptying, Gastric Mucosa, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Satiety Response, Viscosity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review