The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DNA damage is an early event in doxorubicin-induced cardiac myocyte death
Abstract
Anthracyclines are antitumor agents the main clinical limitation of which is cardiac toxicity. The mechanism of this cardiotoxicity is thought to be related to generation of oxidative stress, causing lethal injury to cardiac myocytes. Although protein and lipid oxidation have been documented in anthracycline-treated cardiac myocytes, DNA damage has not been directly demonstrated. This study was undertaken to determine whether anthracyclines induce cardiac myocyte DNA damage and whether this damage is linked to a signaling pathway culminating in cell death. H9c2 cardiac myocytes were treated with the anthracycline doxorubicin at clinically relevant concentrations, and DNA damage was assessed using the alkaline comet assay. Doxorubicin induced DNA damage, as shown by a significant increase in the mean tail moment above control, an effect ameliorated by inclusion of a free radical scavenger. Repair of DNA damage was incomplete after doxorubicin treatment in contrast to the complete repair observed in H 2 O 2-treated myocytes after removal of the agent. Immunoblot analysis revealed that p53 activation occurred subsequent in time to DNA damage. By a fluorescent assay, doxorubicin induced loss of mitochondrial membrane potential after p53 activation. Chemical inhibition of p53 prevented doxorubicin-induced cell death and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential without preventing DNA damage, indicating that DNA damage was proximal in the events leading from doxorubicin treatment to cardiac myocyte death. Specific doxorubicin-induced DNA lesions included oxidized pyrimidines and 8-hydroxyguanine. DNA damage therefore appears to play an important early role in anthracycline-induced lethal cardiac myocyte injury through a pathway involving p53 and the mitochondria.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective
Zhou, B.-B. S., & Elledge, S. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35044005 · Cited by 3,213
A Chemical Inhibitor of p53 That Protects Mice from the Side Effects of Cancer Therapy
Komarov, P. G., Komarova, E. A., Kondratov, R. V., Christov-Tselkov, K., Coon, J. S., Chernov, M. V., & Gudkov, A. V. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5434.1733 · Cited by 1,270
Cited by
Zhao, L., & Zhang, B. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep44735 · Cited by 375
PGC-1 Coactivators in Cardiac Development and Disease
Rowe, G. C., Jiang, A., & Arany, Z. (2010) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.110.223818 · Cited by 355
Venkatesan, B., Prabhu, S. D., Venkatachalam, K., Mummidi, S., Valente, A. J., Clark, R. A., Delafontaine, P., & Chandrasekar, B. (2010) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.01.005 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- L'Ecuyer, T., Sanjeev, S., Thomas, R., Novak, R., Das, L., Campbell, W., & Heide, R. V.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 291
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- H1273-H1280
- ISSN
- 0363-6135 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1539
- OpenAlex
- W2081872634
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA damage is an early event in doxorubicin-induced cardiac myocyte death. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpheart.00738.2005
- The paper
- L'Ecuyer, T., Sanjeev, S., Thomas, R., Novak, R., Das, L., Campbell, W., & Heide, R. V. (2006). DNA damage is an early event in doxorubicin-induced cardiac myocyte death. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00738.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.