The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A model for human ventricular tissue
Abstract
The experimental and clinical possibilities for studying cardiac arrhythmias in human ventricular myocardium are very limited. Therefore, the use of alternative methods such as computer simulations is of great importance. In this article we introduce a mathematical model of the action potential of human ventricular cells that, while including a high level of electrophysiological detail, is computationally cost-effective enough to be applied in large-scale spatial simulations for the study of reentrant arrhythmias. The model is based on recent experimental data on most of the major ionic currents: the fast sodium, L-type calcium, transient outward, rapid and slow delayed rectifier, and inward rectifier currents. The model includes a basic calcium dynamics, allowing for the realistic modeling of calcium transients, calcium current inactivation, and the contraction staircase. We are able to reproduce human epicardial, endocardial, and M cell action potentials and show that differences can be explained by differences in the transient outward and slow delayed rectifier currents. Our model reproduces the experimentally observed data on action potential duration restitution, which is an important characteristic for reentrant arrhythmias. The conduction velocity restitution of our model is broader than in other models and agrees better with available data. Finally, we model the dynamics of spiral wave rotation in a two-dimensional sheet of human ventricular tissue and show that the spiral wave follows a complex meandering pattern and has a period of 265 ms. We conclude that the proposed model reproduces a variety of electrophysiological behaviors and provides a basis for studies of reentrant arrhythmias in human ventricular tissue.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
O'Hara, T., Virág, L., Varró, A., & Rudy, Y. (2011) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002061 · Cited by 1,196
Alternans and spiral breakup in a human ventricular tissue model
ten Tusscher, K. H. W. J., & Panfilov, A. V. (2006) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00109.2006 · Cited by 1,122
Self-citationEvolution of strategies to improve preclinical cardiac safety testing
Gintant, G., Sager, P. T., & Stockbridge, N. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2015.34 · Cited by 407
Carusi, A., Burrage, K., & Rodríguez, B. (2012) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01151.2011 · Cited by 102
Sarkar, A. X., & Sobie, E. A. (2011) · Heart Rhythm · doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.05.023 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- ten Tusscher, K. H. W. J., Noble, D., Noble, P. J., & Panfilov, A. V.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- H1573-H1589
- ISSN
- 0363-6135 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1539
- OpenAlex
- W2130321115
- Cited by
- 1,416
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A model for human ventricular tissue. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpheart.00794.2003
- The paper
- ten Tusscher, K. H. W. J., Noble, D., Noble, P. J., & Panfilov, A. V. (2004). A model for human ventricular tissue. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00794.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.