The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling
Abstract
At autopsy, 13 nonstenotic human left anterior descending coronary arteries [71.5 ± 7.3 (mean ± SD) yr old] were harvested, and related anamnesis was documented. Preconditioned prepared strips ( n = 78) of segments from the midregion of the left anterior descending coronary artery from the individual layers in axial and circumferential directions were subjected to cyclic quasi-static uniaxial tension tests, and ultimate tensile stresses and stretches were documented. The ratio of outer diameter to total wall thickness was 0.189 ± 0.014; ratios of adventitia, media, and intima thickness to total wall thickness were 0.4 ± 0.03, 0.36 ± 0.03, and 0.27 ± 0.02, respectively; axial in situ stretch of 1.044 ± 0.06 decreased with age. Stress-stretch responses for the individual tissues showed pronounced mechanical heterogeneity. The intima is the stiffest layer over the whole deformation domain, whereas the media in the longitudinal direction is the softest. All specimens exhibited small hysteresis and anisotropic and strong nonlinear behavior in both loading directions. The media and intima showed similar ultimate tensile stresses, which are on average three times smaller than ultimate tensile stresses in the adventitia (1,430 ± 604 kPa circumferential and 1,300 ± 692 kPa longitudinal). The ultimate tensile stretches are similar for all tissue layers. A recently proposed constitutive model was extended and used to represent the deformation behavior for each tissue type over the entire loading range. The study showed the need to model nonstenotic human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening as a composite structure composed of three solid mechanically relevant layers with different mechanical properties. The intima showed significant thickness, load-bearing capacity, and mechanical strength compared with the media and adventitia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Constitutive modelling of arteries
Holzapfel, G. A., & Ogden, R. W. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2010.0058 · Cited by 528
Self-citationBiomechanical properties and microstructure of human ventricular myocardium
Sommer, G., Schriefl, A. J., Andrä, M., Sacherer, M., Viertler, C., Wolinski, H., & Holzapfel, G. A. (2015) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.031 · Cited by 290
Self-citationModelling non-symmetric collagen fibre dispersion in arterial walls
Holzapfel, G. A., Niestrawska, J. A., Ogden, R. W., Reinisch, A. J., & Schriefl, A. J. (2015) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2015.0188 · Cited by 276
Self-citationCilla, M., Pérez‐Rey, I., Martínez, M. A., Peña, E., & Martínez, J. (2018) · International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1002/cnm.3121 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Holzapfel, G. A., Sommer, G., Gasser, C. T., & Regitnig, P.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 289
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- H2048-H2058
- ISSN
- 0363-6135 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1539
- OpenAlex
- W2116463491
- Cited by
- 985
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpheart.00934.2004
- The paper
- Holzapfel, G. A., Sommer, G., Gasser, C. T., & Regitnig, P. (2005). Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00934.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.