Cited by 78Lymphatic System and DiseasesLymphatic Disorders and TreatmentsParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment

Myogenic constriction and dilation of isolated lymphatic vessels

Open access
Davis, Michael J., Davis, Ann M., Ku, Christine W., Gashev, Anatoliy A.·2009·American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that lymphatics would exhibit myogenic constrictions and dilations to intraluminal pressure changes. Collecting lymphatic vessels were isolated from rat mesentery, cannulated, and pressurized for in vitro study. The lymphatic diameter responses to controlled intraluminal pressure steps of different magnitudes were tested in the absence and presence of the inflammatory mediator substance P, which is known to enhance lymphatic contractility. Myogenic constriction, defined as a time-dependent decrease in end-diastolic diameter over a 1- to 2-min period following pressure elevation (after initial distension), was observed in the majority of rat mesenteric lymphatic vessels in vitro and occurred over a relatively wide pressure range (1-15 cmH2O). Myogenic dilation, a time-dependent rise in end-diastolic diameter following pressure reduction, was observed in over half the vessels equilibrated at a low baseline pressure. Myogenic constrictions were independent of the cardiac-like and time-dependent compensatory decline in end-systolic diameter and increase in amplitude observed in almost all vessels following pressure elevation. Substance P increased the percentage of vessels exhibiting myogenic constriction, the magnitude and rate of constriction, and the pressure range over which constriction occurred. Our results demonstrate that myogenic responses occur in collecting lymphatic vessels and suggest that the response may aid in preventing vessel overdistens…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpheart.01040.2008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Myogenic responses in lymphatic vessels are comparable to those in arteries, and lymphatic muscle exhibits rate-sensitive responses to pressure that are stronger than those in arteries.

    “Myogenic responses in lymphatic vessels are comparable to those in arteries (65), and lymphatic muscle also exhibits rate-sensitive responses to pressure (66) that are stronger than those in arteries (67).”

    From Transport and Immune Functions of the Lymphatic System. (2025) · cites this paper as [65]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, M. J., Davis, A. M., Ku, C. W., & Gashev, A. A.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Published
2009-02
Volume
296
Issue
2
Pages
H293-H302
ISSN
  • 0363-6135 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1539
OpenAlex
W2106245989
Cited by
78
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL089784, R01HL089784)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lymphatic System and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lymphatic Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Keywords
lymphatic vessels, myogenic constriction, intraluminal pressure, substance P, lymphatic contractility, mesenteric lymphatics, end-diastolic diameter, inflammation, edema
MeSH terms
Animals, Constriction, Pathologic, Dilatation, Pathologic, Male, Mesentery, Muscle Contraction, Muscle Relaxation, Pressure, Substance P, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Inflammation Mediators, Lymphatic Vessels, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review