The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of methods for removal of ectopy in measurement of heart rate variability
Abstract
Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis uses variations in heart rate to assess activity of the autonomic nervous system. Ectopic beats can affect HRV by introducing mathematical artifact into the computations of time- and frequency-domain measures. Exclusion of ectopy-containing segments of data from analysis has been used to correct for ectopy, but this technique eliminates data and may bias HRV measurements if ectopic beats are causally associated with changes in autonomic tone. We have assessed algorithms for correcting for ectopy: deletion, in which ectopic beats are removed from the R-R sequence; linear and cubic spline interpolation; and nonlinear predictive interpolation, in which ectopy-free R-R sequences are used as templates for replacing ectopic beats. The null method (no ectopy correction) was evaluated to determine the importance of ectopy correction. These methods were applied to computer-generated sequences created by adding simulated ventricular premature depolarizations to 5-min ectopy-free R-R sequences. The null method resulted in significant alterations in HRV. Deletion and nonlinear predictive interpolation performed superiorly to linear or cubic spline interpolation, which overestimated low-frequency power and underestimated high-frequency power. Thus ectopy correction is necessary for HRV analysis; deletion of ectopic beats performs as well as or better than more complicated methods for these relatively short data samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms
Shaffer, F., & Ginsberg, J. P. (2017) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258 · Cited by 7,185
Plews, D. J., Scott, B., Altini, M., Wood, M., Kilding, A. E., & Laursen, P. B. (2017) · International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance · doi:10.1123/ijspp.2016-0668 · Cited by 312
Quantifying Errors in Spectral Estimates of HRV Due to Beat Replacement and Resampling
Clifford, G. D., & Tarassenko, L. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2005.844028 · Cited by 285
ARTiiFACT: a tool for heart rate artifact processing and heart rate variability analysis.
Kaufmann, T., Sütterlin, S., Schulz, S. M., & Vögele, C. (2011) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0107-7 · Cited by 284
Heart rate variability and occupational stress—systematic review
JÄRVELIN-PASANEN, S., SINIKALLIO, S., & TARVAINEN, M. P. (2018) · Industrial Health · doi:10.2486/indhealth.2017-0190 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Lippman, N., Stein, K. M., & Lerman, B. B.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1994-07-01
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- H411-H418
- ISSN
- 0363-6135 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1539
- OpenAlex
- W2108804492
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of methods for removal of ectopy in measurement of heart rate variability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajpheart.1994.267.1.h411
- The paper
- Lippman, N., Stein, K. M., & Lerman, B. B. (1994). Comparison of methods for removal of ectopy in measurement of heart rate variability. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.1994.267.1.h411
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.