The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In vivo differentiation potential of tracheal basal cells: evidence for multipotent and unipotent subpopulations
Abstract
The composition of the conducting airway epithelium varies significantly along the proximal to distal axis, with that of the tracheal epithelium exhibiting the greatest complexity. A number of progenitor cells have been proposed to contribute to the maintenance of this cellular diversity both in the steady state and in response to injury. However, individual roles for each progenitor cell type are poorly defined in vivo. The present study was undertaken to investigate the hypothesis that basal cells represent a multipotent progenitor cell type for renewal of the injured tracheal epithelium. To understand their contribution to epithelial repair, mice were exposed to naphthalene to induce airway injury and depletion of the secretory cell progenitor pool. Injury resulted in a rapid induction of cytokeratin 14 (K14) expression among the majority of GSI-B 4-reactive cells and associated hyperplasia of basal cells. Restoration of depleted secretory cells occurred after 6 days of recovery and was associated with regression of the basal cell hyperplasia, suggesting a progenitor-progeny relationship. Multipotent differentiation of basal cells was confirmed using a bitransgenic ligand-regulated Cre-loxP reporter approach in which expression of a ubiquitously expressed LacZ reporter was activated within K14-expressing progenitor cells during airway repair. With the use of this approach, it was determined that K14-expressing cells include subsets capable of either multipotent or unipotent differentiation in vivo. We conclude that basal cells have the capacity for restoration of a fully differentiated epithelium.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A single-cell atlas of the airway epithelium reveals the CFTR-rich pulmonary ionocyte
Plasschaert, L. W., Žilionis, R., Choo-Wing, R., Savova, V., Knehr, J., Roma, G., Klein, A. M., & Jaffe, A. B. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0394-6 · Cited by 1,047
Rawlins, E. L., Okubo, T., Xue, Y., Brass, D. M., Auten, R. L., Hasegawa, H., Wang, F., & Hogan, B. L. M. (2009) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2009.04.002 · Cited by 853
The aging lung: Physiology, disease, and immunity
Schneider, J. L., Rowe, J. H., Garcia-de-Alba, C., Kim, C. F., Sharpe, A. H., & Haigis, M. C. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.005 · Cited by 500
The Cellular and Physiological Basis for Lung Repair and Regeneration: Past, Present, and Future
Basil, M. C., Katzen, J., Engler, A. E., Guo, M., Herriges, M. J., Kathiriya, J. J., Windmueller, R., Ysasi, A. B., Zacharias, W. J., Chapman, H. A., et al. (2020) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2020.03.009 · Cited by 414
Adult cell plasticity in vivo: de-differentiation and transdifferentiation are back in style
Merrell, A. J., & Stanger, B. Z. (2016) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.24 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, K. U., Reynolds, S. D., Watkins, S., Fuchs, E., & Stripp, B. R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- L643-L649
- ISSN
- 1040-0605 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1504
- OpenAlex
- W2143314514
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In vivo differentiation potential of tracheal basal cells: evidence for multipotent and unipotent subpopulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajplung.00155.2003
- The paper
- Hong, K. U., Reynolds, S. D., Watkins, S., Fuchs, E., & Stripp, B. R. (2004). In vivo differentiation potential of tracheal basal cells: evidence for multipotent and unipotent subpopulations. American Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00155.2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.