Cited by 449Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and ObesityBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Oral sucrose stimulation increases accumbens dopamine in the rat

Hajnal, Andras, Smith, Gerard P., Norgren, Ralph·2004·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

Although taste can influence meal size and body weight, the neural substrate for these effects remains obscure. Dopamine, particularly in the nucleus accumbens, has been implicated in both natural and nonnatural rewards. To isolate the orosensory effects of taste from possible postingestive consequences, we investigated the quantitative relationship between sham feeding of sucrose and extracellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens with microdialysis in rats. Sucrose intake linearly increased as a function of concentration (0.03 M, 18.07 ± 2.41 ml; 0.1 M, 30.92 ± 2.60 ml; 0.3 M, 43.28 ± 2.88 ml). Sham feeding also stimulated accumbens dopamine overflow as a function of sucrose solution concentration (0.03 M, 120.76 ± 2.6%; 0.1 M, 140.28 ± 7.8%; 0.3 M, 146.27 ± 5.05%). A second experiment used the same protocol but clamped the amount of sucrose ingested and revealed a similar, concentration-dependent dopamine activation in the nucleus accumbens. This is the first demonstration of a quantitative relationship between the concentration-dependent rewarding effect of orosensory stimulation by sucrose during eating and the overflow of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens. This finding provides new and strong support for accumbens dopamine in the rewarding effect of sucrose.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.00282.2003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When palatable foods such as sucrose are actually consumed, a sustained and sweetness-dependent increase occurs in nucleus accumbens dopamine levels and turnover.

    “In addition, when palatable foods such as sucrose are actually consumed, a sustained and sweetness-dependent increase occurs in nucleus accumbens dopamine levels and turnover ([75](#B75), [80](#B80), [165](#B165)).”

    From Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [75]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 75 · Cited by 449

Authors
Hajnal, A., Smith, G. P., & Norgren, R.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
2004-01
Volume
286
Issue
1
Pages
R31-R37
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W1979009659
Cited by
449
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 38
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R03DC004751, DC 04751, DC 00240, R01DC000240)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
sucrose, nucleus accumbens, dopamine, taste, reward, sham feeding, dopamine overflow, sucrose concentration, feeding behavior, microdialysis
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Dopamine, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Osmolar Concentration, Reward, Sucrose, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Microdialysis, Feedback, Psychological, Extracellular Fluid, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review