Cited by 9Diabetes Management and ResearchPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Modeling glucose and free fatty acid kinetics during insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test in healthy humans: role of counterregulatory response

Thomaseth, Karl, Brehm, Attila, Pavan, Alessandra, Pacini, Giovanni, Roden, Michael·2014·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

Insulin administration during insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test (IM-IVGTT) can induce transient hypoglycemia in healthy insulin-sensitive subjects. This triggers counterregulatory reflex (CRR) responses, which influence the kinetics of glucose and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA), and undermines the accuracy of mathematical modeling methods that do not explicitly account for CRR. The aim of this study is to evaluate mathematical models of glucose and NEFA kinetics against experimental data in the presence or absence of CRR. Thirteen healthy nondiabetic subjects underwent a standard IM-IVGTT and a modified test (GC-IM-IVGTT) with a variable glucose infusion preventing hypoglycemia. While model predictions fit very well with glucose and NEFA data from GC-IM-IVGTT, they lagged behind observations from IM-IVGTT during recovery from hypoglycemia, independently of insulinemia, which did not differ significantly between protocols. A modification to the glucose minimal model, using the glucose concentration below a threshold as a signal for CRR, improves model predictions for both glucose and NEFA. The associated increase in endogenous glucose production correlates, among various CRR hormones, mainly with the dynamics of glucagon concentration. The modified minimal models introduce new parameters that quantify strength and duration of CRR following hypoglycemia. Although CRR represents an unwanted side-effect in IM-IVGTT occurring only in insulin-sensitive subjects,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.00314.2013

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomaseth, K., Brehm, A., Pavan, A., Pacini, G., & Roden, M.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • Hanusch Hospital (AT)
  • Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE)
Corresponding author
Thomaseth, Karl
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
2014-08-01
Volume
307
Issue
3
Pages
R321-R331
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W2134644731
Cited by
9
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Regione del Veneto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
counterregulatory response, glucose kinetics, free fatty acids, hypoglycemia, glucagon, endogenous glucose production, insulin sensitivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Female, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Male, Models, Biological, Models, Theoretical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review