Cited by 19Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

Spinoreticular cell responses to renal venous and ureteral occlusion

Ammons, W. S.·1988·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

Responses of 65 thoracolumbar spinoreticular neurons to renal vein or ureteral occlusion were studied in 40 alpha-chloralose-anesthetized cats. Cells were antidromically activated from the medial medullary reticular formation and all responded to somatic stimuli as well as renal nerve stimulation. Renal vein occlusion excited 17 of 40 cells. Activity increased from 6 +/- 1 to 13 +/- 2 spikes/s, with little adaptation. Depressor responses occurred in 9 cats and pressor responses in 12 cats. Pressor responses, but not depressor responses, were abolished by renal denervation. Ureteral occlusion increased activity of 28 of 50 cells. Responses were always rapid in onset but were either nonadapting, slowly adapting, or completely adapting. Activity increased from 7 +/- 1 to a peak of 17 +/- 3 spikes/s. Pressor responses occurred in 22 of 25 cats and tachycardia in 15 cats. Transection of renal nerves abolished cardiovascular responses. Twenty-five cells were tested for responses for both stimuli. Ten were excited by both, six by only ureteral occlusion, and nine failed to respond to either. The responding group of cells had a significantly greater incidence of A delta- and C-fiber renal input compared with nonresponding cells. Nonresponding cells tended to have only A delta-input. The results show that renal and ureteral mechanical stimuli which evoke cardiovascular reflexes excite spinoreticular cells. These cells may be part of supraspinal reflex arcs initiated by renal receptors…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.1988.254.2.r268

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased pelvic pressure raises afferent renal nerve activity.

    “One such stimulus is increased pelvic pressure, which results in increased afferent renal nerve activity46–48.”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ammons, W. S.
Affiliations
Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Corresponding author
Ammons, W. S.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
1988-02-01
Volume
254
Issue
2
Pages
R268-R276
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W2257587994
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-36378, HL-30985)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
renal vein occlusion, ureteral occlusion, renal nerve stimulation, pressor response, depressor response, tachycardia, renal denervation, A-delta fibers, C-fibers, cardiovascular reflexes, antidromic activation
MeSH terms
Afferent Pathways, Animals, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Cats, Electrophysiology, Evoked Potentials, Kidney, Mechanoreceptors, Reflex, Renal Veins, Reticular Formation, Spinal Cord, Ureter

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review