Cited by 124Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of desipramine on sympathetic nerve firing and norepinephrine spillover to plasma in humans

Esler, M. D., Wallin, G., Dorward, P. K., Eisenhofer, G., Westerman, R., Meredith, I., Lambert, G., Cox, H. S., Jennings, G.·1991·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

In isolated organs, or when given in low dose intra-arterially, tricyclic antidepressant drugs are known to block reuptake of norepinephrine into sympathetic nerve varicosities, with a resultant increased norepinephrine washout. On the other hand, systemic administration of such drugs in humans reduces norepinephrine spillover to plasma. To clarify these seemingly contradictory findings, we have measured concurrently muscle sympathetic activity in the peroneal nerve (microneurography) and rates of norepinephrine spillover to plasma for the body as a whole and for the heart, the kidneys, and the forearm (radiotracer technique), both before and after intravenous infusion of desipramine, 0.5 mg/kg. Desipramine lowered the overflow of norepinephrine to plasma for the body as a whole and from the forearm and the kidneys (by 30-50%) but increased cardiac norepinephrine spillover by 25%. Both the number of sympathetic bursts per min in the peroneal nerve and their mean voltage amplitudes were markedly reduced after desipramine; total activity (bursts/min x mean burst amplitude) fell by approximately 90%. The effects of desipramine on norepinephrine spillover are explicable in terms of inhibition of central sympathetic outflow, balanced against the local blockade of transmitter reuptake. In most sites, the predominant effect is a reduction of norepinephrine overflow. For the heart, where reuptake is so important in transmitter disposition, the net effect is increased overflow.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.1991.260.4.r817

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 124

Metadata

Authors
Esler, M. D., Wallin, G., Dorward, P. K., Eisenhofer, G., Westerman, R., Meredith, I., Lambert, G., Cox, H. S., & Jennings, G.
Affiliations
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
1991-04-01
Volume
260
Issue
4
Pages
R817-R823
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W1915438004
Cited by
124
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
desipramine, norepinephrine spillover, sympathetic activity, tricyclic antidepressants, norepinephrine uptake, central sympathetic outflow, radiotracer technique
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Desipramine, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscles, Neurons, Norepinephrine, Peroneal Nerve, Sympathetic Nervous System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review