Cited by 53Urinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchIon Transport and Channel RegulationBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase inhibition sensitizes renal mechanoreceptors activated by increases in renal pelvic pressure

Kopp, U. C., Smith, L. A., Pence, A. L.·1994·American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology

Abstract

In anesthetized rats, the activation threshold of renal pelvic mechanoreceptors was determined by graded increases in renal pelvic pressure. Ipsilateral afferent renal nerve activity increased 9 +/- 4 (NS), 34 +/- 12, 47 +/- 8, 58 +/- 13, 68 +/- 14, and 91 +/- 17% (all P 2.5 mmHg. Renal pelvic perfusion with 1.4 mM ouabain, an inhibitor of Na(+)-K(+)-adenosinetriphosphatase (Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase), increased basal afferent renal nerve activity transiently, lowered the activation threshold of renal mechanoreceptors to < 2.5 mmHg, and enhanced the afferent renal nerve activity, responses to increasing renal pelvic pressures by 8 and 30 mmHg. The afferent renal nerve activity response to increased renal pelvic pressure was also enhanced by renal pelvic perfusion with 900 mM NaCl but was unaltered by NaCl concentrations ranging from 10 to 600 mM. These findings show that renal pelvic mechanoreceptors are activated by increases in renal pelvic pressure within the physiological range. Although renal Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase contributes to the maintenance of the resting membrane potential of renal pelvic mechanoreceptors, the renal pelvic mechanoreceptor discharge is not influenced by physiological renal pelvic Na+ concentrations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajpregu.1994.267.4.r1109

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased pelvic pressure raises afferent renal nerve activity.

    “One such stimulus is increased pelvic pressure, which results in increased afferent renal nerve activity46–48.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kopp, U. C., Smith, L. A., & Pence, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
Published
1994-10-01
Volume
267
Issue
4
Pages
R1109-R1117
ISSN
  • 0363-6119 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1490
OpenAlex
W2187929231
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50hl044546-05)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-44546)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
Na+/K+-ATPase, renal pelvic pressure, ouabain, diuresis, sodium excretion, sodium chloride
MeSH terms
Sodium-Potassium-Exchanging ATPase, Afferent Pathways, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Diuresis, Kidney, Functional Laterality, Male, Mechanoreceptors, Natriuresis, Ouabain, Perfusion, Pressure, Sodium Chloride, Sympathetic Nervous System, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review