The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Two splice variants of claudin-10 in the kidney create paracellular pores with different ion selectivities
Abstract
Members of the large claudin family of tight junction (TJ) proteins create the differences in paracellular conductance and charge selectivity observed among different epithelia. Previous studies demonstrated that ionic charge selectivity is influenced by acidic or basic amino acids on the first extracellular domain of claudins. We noted two alternatively spliced variants of claudin-10 in the database, 10a and 10b, which are predicted to encode two different first extracellular domains and asked whether this might be a novel mechanism to generate two different permselectivities from a single gene. Using quantitative PCR, we found that claudin-10b is widely expressed among tissues including the kidney; however, claudin-10a is unique to the kidney. Using a nondiscriminating antibody, we found that claudin-10 (a plus b) is expressed in most segments of the nephron. In situ hybridization, however, showed that mRNA for 10a is concentrated in the cortex, and mRNA for 10b is more highly expressed in the medulla. Expression in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) II and LLC-PK 1 cells reveals that both variants form low-resistance pores, and that claudin-10b is more selective for cations than claudin-10a. Charge-reversing mutations of cationic residues on 10a reveal positions that contribute to its anion selectivity. We conclude that alternative splicing of claudin-10 generates unique permselectivities and might contribute to the variable paracellular transport observed along the nephron.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Intestinal barrier function: molecular regulation and disease pathogenesis
Groschwitz, K. R., & Hogan, S. P. (2009) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2009.05.038 · Cited by 1,775
Claudins and the Modulation of Tight Junction Permeability
Günzel, D., & Yu, A. S. L. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2012 · Cited by 1,456
Self-citationPhysiology and function of the tight junction
Anderson, J. M., & Van Itallie, C. M. (2009) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a002584 · Cited by 1,059
Self-citationTight junction-based epithelial microenvironment and cell proliferation
Tsukita, S., Yamazaki, Y., Katsuno, T., Tamura, A., & Tsukita, S. (2008) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2008.344 · Cited by 375
Claudin-19 and the barrier properties of the human retinal pigment epithelium
Peng, S., Rao, V. S., Adelman, R. A., & Rizzolo, L. J. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5984 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Itallie, C. M., Rogan, S., Yu, A., Vidal, L. S., Holmes, J., & Anderson, J. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 291
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- F1288-F1299
- ISSN
- 1522-1466 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-857X
- OpenAlex
- W1998372028
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Two splice variants of claudin-10 in the kidney create paracellular pores with different ion selectivities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajprenal.00138.2006
- The paper
- Van Itallie, C. M., Rogan, S., Yu, A., Vidal, L. S., Holmes, J., & Anderson, J. M. (2006). Two splice variants of claudin-10 in the kidney create paracellular pores with different ion selectivities. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00138.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.