Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MicroRNA-29c in urinary exosome/microvesicle as a biomarker of renal fibrosis

Lv, Lin-Li, Cao, Yu-Han, Ni, Hai-Feng, Xu, Min, Liu, Dan, Liu, Hong, Chen, Ping-Sheng, Liu, Bi-Cheng·2013·American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology

Abstract

Micro (mi)RNAs are frequently dysregulated in the development of renal fibrosis. Exosomes are small membrane vesicles that could be isolated from urine secreted from all nephron segments. Here we sought to observe for the first time whether miRNA in urine exosome could serve as a potential biomarker of renal fibrosis. Urine samples were collected from 32 chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients who underwent kidney biopsy and 7 controls. Exosome was isolated and confirmed by immunogold staining of exosome marker. Members of miR-29, miR-200, and RNU6B as endogenous control were detected by RT quantitative PCR. Electronic microscopy verified a typical shape of exosome with average size of 65.1 nm and labeled it with anti-CD9 and anti-aquaporin 2 antibody. Members of miR-29 and miR-200 are readily measured with reduced levels compared with controls ( P < 0.05) and can robustly distinguish CKD from controls [area under the curve (AUC) varied from 0.902 to 1 by receiver operating characteristics analysis]. miR-29c correlated with both estimated glomerular filtration rate ( r = 0.362; P < 0.05) and degree of tubulointerstitial fibrosis ( r = −0.359; P < 0.05) for CKD patients. Moreover, miRNA in exosome was decreased in mild fibrosis group compared with moderated to severe group. miR-29a and miR-29c could predict degree of tubulointerstitial fibrosis with AUC of 0.883 and 0.738 ( P < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing mild from moderate to severe fibrosis were 93.8 and 81.3% with the use of miR-29a and 68.8 and 81.3% for miR-29c. Overall, miR-29c in urinary exosome correlates with both renal function and degree of histological fibrosis, suggesting it as a novel, noninvasive marker for renal fibrosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajprenal.00148.2013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Lv, L.-L., Cao, Y.-H., Ni, H.-F., Xu, M., Liu, D., Liu, H., Chen, P.-S., & Liu, B.-C.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
Published
2013-10-15
Volume
305
Issue
8
Pages
F1220-F1227
ISSN
  • 1522-1466 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-857X
OpenAlex
W2146796052
Cited by
244
References
1
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MicroRNA-29c in urinary exosome/microvesicle as a biomarker of renal fibrosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajprenal.00148.2013
The paper
Lv, L.-L., Cao, Y.-H., Ni, H.-F., Xu, M., Liu, D., Liu, H., Chen, P.-S., & Liu, B.-C. (2013). MicroRNA-29c in urinary exosome/microvesicle as a biomarker of renal fibrosis. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00148.2013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.