Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chloroquine and inhibition of Toll-like receptor 9 protect from sepsis-induced acute kidney injury

Open access
Yasuda, Hideo, Leelahavanichkul, Asada, Tsunoda, Shinichiro, Dear, James W., Takahashi, Yoshiyuki, Ito, Shuichi, Hu, Xuzhen, Zhou, Hua, Doi, Kent, Childs, Richard, Klinman, Dennis M., Yuen, Peter S. T., Star, Robert A.·2008·American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology

Abstract

Mortality from sepsis has remained high despite recent advances in supportive and targeted therapies. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) sense bacterial products and stimulate pathogenic innate immune responses. Mice deficient in the common adapter protein MyD88, downstream from most TLRs, have reduced mortality and acute kidney injury (AKI) from polymicrobial sepsis. However, the identity of the TLR(s) responsible for the host response to polymicrobial sepsis is unknown. Here, we show that chloroquine, an inhibitor of endocytic TLRs (TLR3, 7, 8, 9), improves sepsis-induced mortality and AKI in a clinically relevant polymicrobial sepsis mouse model, even when administered 6 h after the septic insult. Chloroquine administration attenuated the decline in renal function, splenic apoptosis, serum markers of damage to other organs, and prototypical serum pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-10. An oligodeoxynucleotide inhibitor (H154) of TLR9 and TLR9-deficient mice mirror the actions of chloroquine in all functional parameters that we tested. In addition, chloroquine decreased TLR9 protein abundance in spleen, further suggesting that TLR9 signaling may be a major target for the protective actions of chloroquine. Our findings indicate that chloroquine improves survival by inhibiting multiple pathways leading to polymicrobial sepsis and that chloroquine and TLR9 inhibitors represent viable broad-spectrum and targeted therapeutic strategies, respectively, that are promising candidates for further clinical development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/ajprenal.00461.2007

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Yasuda, H., Leelahavanichkul, A., Tsunoda, S., Dear, J. W., Takahashi, Y., Ito, S., Hu, X., Zhou, H., Doi, K., Childs, R., Klinman, D. M., Yuen, P. S. T., & Star, R. A.
Venue
American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
Published
2008-05
Volume
294
Issue
5
Pages
F1050-F1058
ISSN
  • 1522-1466 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-857X
OpenAlex
W2125499106
Cited by
192
References
7
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chloroquine and inhibition of Toll-like receptor 9 protect from sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajprenal.00461.2007
The paper
Yasuda, H., Leelahavanichkul, A., Tsunoda, S., Dear, J. W., Takahashi, Y., Ito, S., Hu, X., Zhou, H., Doi, K., Childs, R., Klinman, D. M., Yuen, P. S. T., & Star, R. A. (2008). Chloroquine and inhibition of Toll-like receptor 9 protect from sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00461.2007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.