The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hyperfiltration in remnant nephrons: a potentially adverse response to renal ablation
Abstract
Micropuncture studies were performed in three groups of male Munich-Wistar rats 1 wk after surgery: group I, eight control rats that underwent laparotomy and were fed a normal diet; group II, nine rats that underwent right nephrectomy and segmental infarction of five-sixths of the left kidney and were fed a normal diet; and group III, seven rats that underwent the same renal ablative procedure and were fed a low protein diet. Single nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR) was higher in the remnant kidney of group II rats compared with group I rats due to higher average values for mean glomerular transcapillary hydraulic pressure difference (delta P) and initial glomerular plasma flow rate (QA) in group II. Glomeruli in remnant kidneys of group II showed striking alterations in morphology, including epithelial cell protein reabsorption droplets, foot process fusion, and mesangial expansion. Group III rats demonstrated a mean SNGFR not statistically different from that of group I, but significantly less than that of group II rats. This lack of absolute hyperfiltration in remnant glomeruli of group III rats relative to group I obtained because QA and delta P did not increase above values found in group I. The glomerular structural lesions seen in group II were also largely attenuated in group III. These studies demonstrate that alterations in glomerular hemodynamics associated with renal ablation are accompanied by structural lesions and suggest that sustained single nephron hyperfiltration may have maladaptive consequences by damaging remnant glomeruli.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Levey, A. S., & Coresh, J. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60178-5 · Cited by 1,841
Glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetes: mechanisms, clinical significance, and treatment
Tonneijck, L., Muskiet, M. H. A., Smits, M. M., van Bommel, E. J., Heerspink, H. J. L., van Raalte, D. H., & Joles, J. A. (2017) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2016060666 · Cited by 887
Glomerular hyperfiltration: definitions, mechanisms and clinical implications
Helal, I., Fick-Brosnahan, G. M., Reed-Gitomer, B., & Schrier, R. W. (2012) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2012.19 · Cited by 673
Understanding the nature of renal disease progression
Remuzzi, G., Ruggenenti, P., & Benigni, A. (1997) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.1997.2 · Cited by 649
Nephron adaptation to renal injury or ablation
Brenner, B. M. (1985) · American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajprenal.1985.249.3.f324 · Cited by 641
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hostetter, T. H., Olson, J. L., Rennke, H. G., Venkatachalam, M. A., & Brenner, B. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1981-07-01
- Volume
- 241
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- F85-F93
- ISSN
- 1522-1466 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-857X
- OpenAlex
- W2264139579
- Cited by
- 1,680
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperfiltration in remnant nephrons: a potentially adverse response to renal ablation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/ajprenal.1981.241.1.f85
- The paper
- Hostetter, T. H., Olson, J. L., Rennke, H. G., Venkatachalam, M. A., & Brenner, B. M. (1981). Hyperfiltration in remnant nephrons: a potentially adverse response to renal ablation. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.1981.241.1.f85
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.