Cited by 346Cardiovascular and exercise physiologyBlood transfusion and managementTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Response to exercise after blood loss and reinfusion

Ekblom, B, Goldbarg, A N, Gullbring, B·1972·Journal of Applied Physiology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1972.33.2.175

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 344

Metadata

Authors
Ekblom, B., Goldbarg, A. N., & Gullbring, B.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1972-08
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
175-180
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2144408971
Cited by
346
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood transfusion and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Keywords
exercise response, blood loss, blood reinfusion, blood transfusion, exercise physiology
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Transfusion, Physical Exertion, Heart Rate, Hemoglobins, Humans, Lactates, Male, Motor Activity, Oxygen Consumption, Respiration, Spirometry, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review