Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Longitudinal variations in maximal oxygen intake with age and activity.

Dehn, M M, Bruce, R A·1972·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

variations in maximal oxygen intake with age and activity. J. Appl. Phys-iol. 33(6) : 805407. 1972.--Maximal oxygen intake was measured during a multistage-treadmill test in 86 healthy men be-tween 40 and 72 years of age. Forty had previous determinations 2.3 years earlier. Cross-sectional data revealed an average annual decrement in ~OZ rrlaxof- 0.28 ml/(kg.min);combined datafrom 17 cross-sectional studies averaged (- 0.40 ml/(kg emin) per year). Our longitudinal data revealed an annual decrement (-0.94 ml/(kg amin)) which was significantly greater and compared re-markably well with two other longitudinal studies. Differences in weight-adjusted Voz M8X with aging relate to uncontrolled popula-tion truncation with cross-sectional sampling; changes in body weight and composition contribute less significantly. Stratification according to habitual physical activity revealed that sedentary men experience a threefold greater decline in BOB,,, than do habitual

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1972.33.6.805

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Dehn, M. M., & Bruce, R. A.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1972-12
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
805-807
ISSN
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
Cited by
259
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review