The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maximal aerobic capacity at different levels of carboxyhemoglobin
Abstract
Previous studies had indicated that maximum aerobic power (VO2 max) would be seriously impaired when HbCO levels were above 7% but was not altered if HbCO was around 2.7%. The present studies indicated that the critical level at which HbCO influenced VO2 max was approximately 4.3%. This was accompanied as in the above-noted studied with a reduction in total work time to the attainment of VO2 max. Two procedures to raise HbCO to appropriate levels were employed, i.e., a buildup wherin HbCO was incrementally increased by breathing ambient air containing 75 or 100 ppm CO and a bolus plus maintenance procedure. In the latter, HbCO was raised to the level attained in the buildup test by giving a “bolus” of CO followed by the continued inhalation of CO at a level to just maintain this level of HbCO regardless of the magnitude of the ventilation. Regardless of the mode of presentation, the decrement in VO2 max occurred at the same level of HbCO. These observations are of considerable significance, since it indicated that even low ambient levels of CO (23.7 ppm) would result in lowering maximum aerobic power if the individual had been previously exposed to CO such that the level was raised to this critical point.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The 5.5% level in smokers in the present study is greater than the 4.3% level, previously shown to be the minimal level affecting V ˙O2 max (Horvath et al., 1975).”
From Effects of Habitual Smoking on Cardiorespiratory Responses to Sub-maximal Exercise (2004) · cites this paper as Horvath et al., 1975
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of Habitual Smoking on Cardiorespiratory Responses to Sub-maximal Exercise
Kobayashi, Y., Takeuchi, T., Hosoi, T., & Loeppky, J. A. (2004) · Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY and Applied Human Science · doi:10.2114/jpa.23.163 · Cited by 72
Smoking-Induced Elevations in Blood Carboxyhaemoglobin Levels: Effect on Maximal Oxygen Uptake
McDonough, P., & Moffatt, R. J. (1999) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-199927050-00001 · Cited by 63
Maximum oxygen uptake capacity of smokers of different age groups.
CHATTERJEE, S., DEY, S. K., & NAG, S. K. (1987) · The Japanese Journal of Physiology · doi:10.2170/jjphysiol.37.837 · Cited by 20
Carbon monoxide exposure during exercise performance: muscle and cerebral oxygenation
Keramidas, M. E., Kounalakis, S. N., Eiken, O., & Mekjavic, I. B. (2012) · Acta Physiologica · doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.2011.02363.x · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Horvath, S. M., Raven, P. B., Dahms, T. E., & Gray, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1975-02-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 300-303
- ISSN
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Maximal aerobic capacity at different levels of carboxyhemoglobin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1975.38.2.300
- The paper
- Horvath, S. M., Raven, P. B., Dahms, T. E., & Gray, D. J. (1975). Maximal aerobic capacity at different levels of carboxyhemoglobin. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1975.38.2.300
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.