The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of static muscular contraction on impulse activity of groups III and IV afferents in cats
Abstract
Static contraction of the hindlimb muscles, induced by electrical stimulation of the ventral roots, reflexly increases arterial blood pressure and heart rate. Although stimulation of groups III and IV muscle afferents is believed to cause these reflex increases, the responses of these afferents to a level of static contraction that increases arterial pressure have not yet been determined. Therefore, in barbiturate-anesthetized cats, afferent impulses arising from endings in the gastrocnemius muscle were recorded from the L7 or S1 dorsal roots, while the cut peripheral end of the L7 ventral root was stimulated. In addition, the effects of capsaicin (100-200 micrograms) and bradykinin (25 micrograms) on the activity of the groups III and IV afferents stimulated by contraction were examined. Contraction of the gastrocnemius muscle to a level equal to or greater than that needed to cause a pressor response stimulated 12 of 19 (63%) group III afferents and 13 of 19 (68%) group IV afferents. However, the discharge patterns of the group III afferents stimulated by contraction were very different from those of the group IV fibers. No relationship was found between those fibers stimulated by contraction and those stimulated by chemicals. Our results suggest that although both groups III and IV muscle afferents contribute to the reflex cardiovascular increases evoked by static exercise, group III fibers were likely to be stimulated by the mechanical effects of muscular contraction, whereas at least some group IV fibers were likely to be stimulated by the metabolic products of muscular contraction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Proske, U., & Gandevia, S. C. (2012) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00048.2011 · Cited by 2,223
Cerebral perturbations provoked by prolonged exercise
Nybo, L., & Secher, N. H. (2004) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.005 · Cited by 398
Effects of the ovarian cycle on sympathetic neural outflow during static exercise
Ettinger, S. M., Silber, D. H., Gray, K. S., Smith, M. B., Yang, Q. X., Kunselman, A. R., & Sinoway, L. I. (1998) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1998.85.6.2075 · Cited by 125
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity during Exercise
Katayama, K., & Saito, M. (2019) · The Journal of Physiological Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12576-019-00669-6 · Cited by 108
Snaterse, M., Ton, R., Kuo, A. D., & Donelan, J. M. (2011) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00536.2010 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaufman, M. P., Longhurst, J. C., Rybicki, K. J., Wallach, J. H., & Mitchell, J. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1983-07-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-112
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2095971269
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of static muscular contraction on impulse activity of groups III and IV afferents in cats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1983.55.1.105
- The paper
- Kaufman, M. P., Longhurst, J. C., Rybicki, K. J., Wallach, J. H., & Mitchell, J. H. (1983). Effects of static muscular contraction on impulse activity of groups III and IV afferents in cats. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1983.55.1.105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.