The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Estimation of volume of epithelial lining fluid recovered by lavage using urea as marker of dilution
Abstract
Bronchoalveolar lavage is a powerful technique for sampling the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) of the lower respiratory tract but also results in a significant dilution of that fluid. To quantify the apparent volume of ELF obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage, urea was used as an endogenous marker of ELF dilution. Since urea diffuses readily through the body, plasma and in situ ELF urea concentrations are identical; thus ELF volume can be calculated using simple dilution principles. Using this approach, we determined that with a standard lavage procedure, the volume of ELF recovered from a normal human is 1.0 +/- 0.1 ml/100 ml of recovered lavage fluid. Time course experiments in which the saline used for lavage was permitted to remain in the lower respiratory tract for various “dwell times” suggested that diffusion of urea from sources other than recovered ELF can contribute to the total urea recovered resulting in an overestimate of the volume of ELF recovered. Thus, while reasonably accurate, the volume of ELF determined by urea must be considered an overestimate, or “apparent” volume. The ELF albumin concentration based on the apparent ELF volume was 3.7 +/- 0.3 mg/ml, a value that is in good agreement with direct measurements made by other techniques in experimental animals. The density of all inflammatory and immune effector cells on the epithelial surface of the lower respiratory tract, based on the apparent ELF volume, was 21,000 +/- 3,000 cells/microliter, a value that is twofold greater than that in blood.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Endogenous Airway Acidification: Implications for Asthma Pathophysiology
HUNT, J. F., FANG, K., MALIK, R., SNYDER, A., MALHOTRA, N., PLATTS-MILLS, T. A. E., & GASTON, B. (2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.3.9911005 · Cited by 649
Mechanisms of macromolecule absorption by the lungs
Patton, J. S. (1996) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/0169-409x(95)00113-l · Cited by 641
Replacement Therapy for Alpha1-Antitrypsin Deficiency Associated with Emphysema
Wewers, M. D., Casolaro, M. A., Sellers, S. E., Swayze, S. C., McPhaul, K. M., Wittes, J. T., & Crystal, R. G. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198704233161704 · Cited by 641
Self-citationOzone-induced inflammation in the lower airways of human subjects
Koren, H. S., Devlin, R. B., Graham, D. E., Mann, R., McGee, M. P., Horstman, D. H., Kozumbo, W. J., Becker, S., House, D. E., McDonnell, W. F., et al. (1989) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/139.2.407 · Cited by 499
Progressive Preclinical Interstitial Lung Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Gochuico, B. R. (2008) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2007.59 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Rennard, S. I., Basset, G., Lecossier, D., O'Donnell, K. M., Pinkston, P., Martin, P. G., & Crystal, R. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1986-02-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 532-538
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2129707656
- Cited by
- 1,131
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of volume of epithelial lining fluid recovered by lavage using urea as marker of dilution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1986.60.2.532
- The paper
- Rennard, S. I., Basset, G., Lecossier, D., O'Donnell, K. M., Pinkston, P., Martin, P. G., & Crystal, R. G. (1986). Estimation of volume of epithelial lining fluid recovered by lavage using urea as marker of dilution. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1986.60.2.532
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.