The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of lung volume on maximal methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in normal humans
Abstract
We examined the effects of lung volume on the bronchoconstriction induced by inhaled aerosolized methacholine (MCh) in seven normal subjects. We constructed dose-response curves to MCh, using measurements of inspiratory pulmonary resistance (RL) during tidal breathing at functional residual capacity (FRC) and after a change in end-expiratory lung volume (EEV) to either FRC -0.5 liter (n = 5) or FRC +0.5 liter (n = 2). Aerosols of MCh were generated using a nebulizer with an output of 0.12 ml/min and administered for 2 min in progressively doubling concentrations from 1 to 256 mg/ml. After MCh, RL rose from a base-line value of 2.1 +/- 0.3 cmH2O. 1–1 X s (mean +/- SE; n = 7) to a maximum of 13.9 +/- 1.8. In five of the seven subjects a plateau response to MCh was obtained at FRC. There was no correlation between the concentration of MCh required to double RL and the maximum value of RL. The dose-response relationship to MCh was markedly altered by changing lung volume. The bronchoconstrictor response was enhanced at FRC - 0.5 liter; RL reached a maximum of 39.0 +/- 4.0 cmH2O X 1–1 X s. Conversely, at FRC + 0.5 liter the maximum value of RL was reduced in both subjects from 8.2 and 16.6 to 6.0 and 7.7 cmH2O X 1–1 X s, respectively. We conclude that lung volume is a major determinant of the bronchoconstrictor response to MCh in normal subjects. We suggest that changes in lung volume act to alter the forces of interdependence between airways and parenchyma that oppose airway smooth muscle contraction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR ASTHMA MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION
PAUWELS, R. A. (1996) · Arerugī/Arerugi · doi:10.15036/arerugi.45.792 · Cited by 9,994
(2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.162.6.ats9-00 · Cited by 909
The effect of obesity on lung function
Dixon, A. E., & Peters, U. (2018) · Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1080/17476348.2018.1506331 · Cited by 889
The Structure of Large and Small Airways in Nonfatal and Fatal Asthma
Carroll, N., Elliot, J., Morton, A., & James, A. (1993) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/147.2.405 · Cited by 720
Skloot, G., Permutt, S., & Togias, A. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci118296 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, D. J., Martin, J. G., & Macklem, P. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1987-03-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1324-1330
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2263355384
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of lung volume on maximal methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in normal humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1987.62.3.1324
- The paper
- Ding, D. J., Martin, J. G., & Macklem, P. T. (1987). Effects of lung volume on maximal methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in normal humans. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1987.62.3.1324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.