The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inspiratory muscles during exercise: a problem of supply and demand
Abstract
The capacity of inspiratory muscles to generate esophageal pressure at several lung volumes from functional residual capacity (FRC) to total lung capacity (TLC) and several flow rates from zero to maximal flow was measured in five normal subjects. Static capacity was 126 +/- 14.6 cmH2O at FRC, remained unchanged between 30 and 55% TLC, and decreased to 40 +/- 6.8 cmH2O at TLC. Dynamic capacity declined by a further 5.0 +/- 0.35% from the static pressure at any given lung volume for every liter per second increase in inspiratory flow. The subjects underwent progressive incremental exercise to maximum power and achieved 1,800 +/- 45 kpm/min and maximum O2 uptake of 3,518 +/- 222 ml/min. During exercise peak esophageal pressure increased from 9.4 +/- 1.81 to 38.2 +/- 5.70 cmH2O and end-inspiratory esophageal pressure increased from 7.8 +/- 0.52 to 22.5 +/- 2.03 cmH2O from rest to maximum exercise. Because the estimated capacity available to meet these demands is critically dependent on end-inspiratory lung volume, the changes in lung volume during exercise were measured in three of the subjects using He dilution. End-expiratory volume was 52.3 +/- 2.42% TLC at rest and 38.5 +/- 0.79% TLC at maximum exercise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“dyspnoea intensity during exercise in health and in pulmonary diseases generally correlates well with physiological ratios that fundamentally reflect demand/capacity imbalance (e.g.VʹE/maximum ventilatory capacity, Poes/Poes,max, tidal volume/inspiratory capacity, EMGdi/EMGdi,max) [13,28,33,37,38].”
From Mechanisms of exertional dyspnoea in symptomatic smokers without COPD (2016) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing
(2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.167.2.211 · Cited by 3,026
O'Donnell, D. E., & Webb, K. A. (1993) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/148.5.1351 · Cited by 543
Diaphragm Activation during Exercise in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
SINDERBY, C., SPAHIJA, J., BECK, J., KAMINSKI, D., YAN, S., COMTOIS, N., & SLIWINSKI, P. (2001) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2007033 · Cited by 201
Mechanical Constraints on Exercise Hyperpnea in a Fit Aging Population
Johnson, B. D., Reddan, W. G., Seow, K. C., & Dempsey, J. A. (1991) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/143.5_pt_1.968 · Cited by 150
Helium-Hyperoxia, Exercise, and Respiratory Mechanics in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Eves, N. D., Petersen, S. R., Haykowsky, M. J., Wong, E. Y., & Jones, R. L. (2006) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200509-1533oc · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Leblanc, P., Summers, E., Inman, M. D., Jones, N. L., Campbell, E. J., & Killian, K. J.
- Affiliations
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1988-06-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2482-2489
- ISSN
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inspiratory muscles during exercise: a problem of supply and demand. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1988.64.6.2482
- The paper
- Leblanc, P., Summers, E., Inman, M. D., Jones, N. L., Campbell, E. J., & Killian, K. J. (1988). Inspiratory muscles during exercise: a problem of supply and demand. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1988.64.6.2482
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.