The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence that the metabolic acidosis threshold is the anaerobic threshold
Abstract
We evaluated maximal O2 uptake (VO2max), the metabolic acidosis threshold determined by the V-slope analysis [plot of CO2 output (VCO2) as a function of oxygen uptake (VO2)], the ratio of increase in VO2 to work rate increment (delta VO2/delta WR), the upper slope (S2) of the V-slope analysis, and the VO2 for work below and above the metabolic acidosis threshold to determine whether the changes in O2 transport caused by increased carboxyhemoglobin (HbCO) affected these parameters and variables. Ten normal subjects (aged 32.8 +/- 7.1 yr) performed symptom-limited incremental exercise tests in a ramp pattern on a cycle ergometer while breathing air and air with added carbon monoxide to cause HbCO to be approximately 11% and 20%. VO2max decreased by 11.6 and 19.3%, the metabolic acidosis threshold decreased by 11.9 and 19.6%, delta VO2/delta WR decreased by 8.9 and 14.0%, and S2 increased by 13.6 and 21.8% when HbCO was increased to 11 and 20%, respectively. Most importantly, VO2 was unchanged related to work rate below the metabolic acidosis threshold during the tests with increased HbCO but was reduced at the work rates above the metabolic acidosis threshold. These findings are consistent with the concept that the metabolic acidosis threshold is synonymous with an anaerobic threshold, i.e., the latter demarcating the VO2 above which the contracting muscles are not adequately supplied with O2 but below which they are.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The apparent contradiction between this finding and the significant decrease in exercise duration after CO may be explained by the assumption that exposure to CO lowers the anaerobic threshold.”
From Effects of exposure to low concentrations of carbon monoxide on exercise performance and myocardial perfusion in young healthy men. (1999) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“They also showed that increased COHb concentration decreased the metabolic acidosis threshold (anaerobic threshold).”
From Effects of exposure to low concentrations of carbon monoxide on exercise performance and myocardial perfusion in young healthy men. (1999) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Indeed, Koike et al 22 reported that during exercise both lactate concentration and lactate/pyrovate ratio increase only after the anaerobic threshold is reached.”
From Effects of exposure to low concentrations of carbon monoxide on exercise performance and myocardial perfusion in young healthy men. (1999) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smoking-Induced Elevations in Blood Carboxyhaemoglobin Levels: Effect on Maximal Oxygen Uptake
McDonough, P., & Moffatt, R. J. (1999) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-199927050-00001 · Cited by 63
Adir, Y., Merdler, A., Ben Haim, S., Front, A., Harduf, R., & Bitterman, H. (1999) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.56.8.535 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Koike, A., Weiler-Ravell, D., McKenzie, D. K., Zanconato, S., & Wasserman, K.
- Affiliations
- Division of Respiratory and Critical Care Physiology and Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance 90509.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1990-06-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2521-2526
- ISSN
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.