The DOI matches its Crossref record.
High muscle blood flow in man: is maximal O2 extraction compromised?
Abstract
During conventional cycle ergometry, as work rate (WR) is increased toward maximum, O2 extraction increases hyperbolically, typically achieving values of 80–90% at peak O2 uptake (VO2). In contrast, studies using isolated knee-extensor exercise report much higher mass-specific blood flows (Q) and lower maximal O2 extractions (approximately 70%), which have been interpreted as transit time limitation to O2 movement out of the muscle capillary. However, maximal achievable WR levels during conventional cycle ergometry are generally reached (over 10–15 min) after rapid increases in WR, whereas the reported knee-extensor studies have used only more lengthy protocols (45 min). The duration of these protocols may have prevented the attainment of high WR levels and thus high O2 extraction ratios. Accordingly, this investigation examined leg Q and O2 extraction responses during single-leg knee-extensor exercise incremented rapidly (steps of 15–25 W per 2- to 3-min interval), which produced fatigue in 13–15 min. Q and muscle VO2 increased linearly with WR to fatigue with Q-WR and VO2-WR slopes similar to those reported in previous knee-extensor studies. However, with the use of this protocol, very high maximal achievable WR [99 +/- 6 (SE) W] and muscle Q (385 +/- 26 ml.min-1 x 100 g-1) levels were attained, some 80% greater than previously reported. An O2 extraction of 84.6 +/- 2.1% was reached, giving a maximal VO2 of 60.2 +/- 5.8 ml.min-1 x 100 g-1. We conclude that, even under the high Q conditions of single-leg knee-extensor exercise, O2 extraction does not reach a plateau on the basis of short transit times and that previous conclusions to the contrary reflect failure to attain sufficiently high WR levels. Maximal VO2, Q, and O2 extraction in this model have yet to be defined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Joyner, M. J., & Casey, D. P. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00035.2013 · Cited by 833
Myoglobin O2 desaturation during exercise. Evidence of limited O2 transport.
Richardson, R. S., Noyszewski, E. A., Kendrick, K. F., Leigh, J. S., & Wagner, P. D. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci118237 · Cited by 647
Self-citationDeterminants of Oxygen Uptake: Implications for Exercise Testing
Poole, D. C., & Richardson, R. S. (1997) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-199724050-00003 · Cited by 152
Self-citationRegulation of skeletal muscle blood flow during exercise in ageing humans
Hearon, C. M., & Dinenno, F. A. (2016) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp270593 · Cited by 107
Wagenmakers, A. J. M., Strauss, J. A., Shepherd, S. O., Keske, M. A., & Cocks, M. (2016) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2014.284513 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Richardson, R. S., Poole, D. C., Knight, D. R., Kurdak, S. S., Hogan, M. C., Grassi, B., Johnson, E. C., Kendrick, K. F., Erickson, B. K., & Wagner, P. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1993-10-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1911-1916
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2397447528
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High muscle blood flow in man: is maximal O2 extraction compromised? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1993.75.4.1911
- The paper
- Richardson, R. S., Poole, D. C., Knight, D. R., Kurdak, S. S., Hogan, M. C., Grassi, B., Johnson, E. C., Kendrick, K. F., Erickson, B. K., & Wagner, P. D. (1993). High muscle blood flow in man: is maximal O2 extraction compromised? Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1993.75.4.1911
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.