The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Musculotendinous stiffness: its relationship to eccentric, isometric, and concentric performance
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to quantify the relationship between musculotendinous stiffness and performance in eccentric, isometric, and concentric activities. Thirteen trained subjects performed a series of maximal effort eccentric, concentric, and isometric muscular contractions in a bench press-type movement. Additionally, subjects performed a series of quasi-static muscular contractions in a bench press movement. A brief perturbation was applied to the bar while these isometric efforts were maintained, and the resulting damped oscillations provided data pertaining to each subject's musculotendinous stiffness. Musculotendinous stiffness was significantly related to isometric and concentric performance (r = 0.57–0.78) but not to eccentric performance. These results are interpreted as demonstrating that the optimal musculotendinous stiffness for maximum concentric and isometric activities was toward the stiff end of the elasticity continuum. A stiffer musculotendinous unit may facilitate such performances by improving the force production capabilities of the contractile component, due to a combination of improved length and rate of shortening, and additionally by enhancing initial force transmission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Komi, P. (1986) · International Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1025796 · Cited by 293
Cited by
The importance of muscular strength: Training considerations
Suchomel, T. J., Nimphius, S., Bellon, C. R., & Stone, M. H. (2018) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-018-0862-z · Cited by 940
BRADLEY, P. S., OLSEN, P. D., & PORTAS, M. D. (2007) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/00124278-200702000-00040 · Cited by 284
The Use of Isometric Tests of Muscular Function in Athletic Assessment
Wilson, G. J., & Murphy, A. J. (1996) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-199622010-00003 · Cited by 274
Self-citationDel Balso, C., & Cafarelli, E. (2007) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00477.2006 · Cited by 252
A biomechanical comparison of the traditional squat, powerlifting squat, and box squat
Swinton, P. A., Lloyd, R., Keogh, J. W. L., Agouris, I., & Stewart, A. D. (2012) · Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research · doi:10.1519/jsc.0b013e3182577067 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, G. J., Murphy, A. J., & Pryor, J. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1994-06-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2714-2719
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2146369757
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Musculotendinous stiffness: its relationship to eccentric, isometric, and concentric performance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1994.76.6.2714
- The paper
- Wilson, G. J., Murphy, A. J., & Pryor, J. F. (1994). Musculotendinous stiffness: its relationship to eccentric, isometric, and concentric performance. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1994.76.6.2714
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.