Cited by 170Muscle Physiology and DisordersMuscle metabolism and nutritionExercise and Physiological Responses

Muscle function and protein metabolism after initiation of eccentric contraction-induced injury

Lowe, D. A., Warren, G. L., Ingalls, C. P., Boorstein, D. B., Armstrong, R. B.·1995·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

This study was designed to determine the relationship between skeletal muscle function and protein metabolism after initiation of eccentric contraction-induced injury. Mouse anterior crural muscles were injured in vivo, and then either immediately or 3, 6, 24, 48, 72, 120, or 336 h after injury muscles were isolated and studied for indexes of muscle function, injury, phagocyte infiltration, and protein metabolism. A group of mice were administered anti-polymorphonuclear cell and anti-macrophage antisera in an attempt to reduce phagocytic infiltration into injured muscle. Force production in extensor digitorum longus muscles was reduced 55% immediately after injury induction and did not recover significantly until 120 h postinjury (28% below baseline). However, rates of protein degradation were not elevated until 48 h postinjury (60% above normal) and were not correlated with the changes in force production (r = -0.37; P = 0.24). Phagocytic infiltration was evident 24-120 h postinjury and was correlated with the elevated protein degradation rates (r = 0.75; P < 0.01). Protein synthesis rates began to increase approximately 48 h after injury was induced and were elevated by 83% 5 days postinjury. Fourteen days after injury, muscle protein degradation and synthesis rates had returned to normal, as well as specific force production, and phagocytic infiltration was not detected. However, muscle mass, protein content, and absolute force production were lower than normal. Antisera-treated mice were rendered neutropenic, but there was no difference in any variable measured between muscles from these mice and muscles from normal mice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1995.79.4.1260

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 170

Authors
Lowe, D. A., Warren, G. L., Ingalls, C. P., Boorstein, D. B., & Armstrong, R. B.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1995-10-01
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
1260-1270
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2107614370
Cited by
170
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ar042761-03)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR-42761)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
skeletal muscle function, muscle protein metabolism, protein degradation, protein synthesis, neutrophils, macrophages, muscle force production, extensor digitorum longus, muscle mass, antisera
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA, Female, Isometric Contraction, Kinetics, L-Lactate Dehydrogenase, Macrophages, Mice, Inbred ICR, Muscle Contraction, Muscle Proteins, Peroxidase, Neutrophils, Phagocytosis, RNA, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review