The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamics of the cerebral blood flow response to step changes in end-tidal PCO2 and PO2 in humans
Abstract
This study examined the dynamics of the cerebral blood flow response to hypoxia and hypercapnia in humans. Middle cerebral artery blood flow (MCAF) was assessed continuously using transcranial Doppler ultrasound. MCAF was calculated on a beat-by-beat basis as the product of the intensity-weighted mean velocity and the total power of the reflected signal. End-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) and PO2 (PETO2) were controlled using a dynamic end-tidal forcing system. Six repeats of each of four protocols were administered to six subjects. The first was a control protocol with PETO2 held at 100 Torr and PETCO2 held 1-2 Torr above eucapnia throughout. The second was a hypoxic step protocol with PETO2 lowered from control values to 50 Torr for 20 min. The third was a hypercapnic step protocol with PETCO2 elevated from control by 7.5 Torr for 20 min. The fourth was a hypoxic-and-hypercapnic step protocol lasting 20 min. The total power of the Doppler signal remained relatively constant, suggesting that the cross-sectional area of the vessel changed little. After the initial transient in MCAF at the onset of the stimulus, no adaptation or progressive increase was observed over the remaining 20 min. A simple model consisting of a single pure delay, gain terms, time constants, and offsets for the on and off transients was fitted to the hypoxic and hypercapnic protocols. For hypercapnia, all the parameters for the onset were significantly different from the relief of the stimulus. The asymmetry was characterized by a slower on transient than off transient and also by a degree of undershoot after the relief of hypercapnia. Finally, the results from this study show that the cerebral blood flow response to hypoxia and hypercapnia in humans is much faster than has previously been thought.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Resting-state fMRI confounds and cleanup
Murphy, K., Birn, R. M., & Bandettini, P. A. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.001 · Cited by 666
Wise, R. G., Ide, K., Poulin, M. J., & Tracey, I. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.11.025 · Cited by 664
Self-citationBOLD fMRI Identifies Limbic, Paralimbic, and Cerebellar Activation During Air Hunger
Evans, K. C., Banzett, R. B., Adams, L., McKay, L., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Corfield, D. R. (2002) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1500 · Cited by 391
Syncope, cerebral perfusion, and oxygenation
Van Lieshout, J. J., Wieling, W., Karemaker, J. M., & Secher, N. H. (2003) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00260.2002 · Cited by 365
Claassen, J. A. H. R., Zhang, R., Fu, Q., Witkowski, S., & Levine, B. D. (2007) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00906.2006 · Cited by 172
Cerebral hemodynamics during orthostatic stress assessed by nonlinear modeling
Mitsis, G. D., Zhang, R., Levine, B. D., & Marmarelis, V. Z. (2006) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00548.2005 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Poulin, M. J., Liang, P. J., & Robbins, P. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 1996-09-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1084-1095
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2341223505
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.