Cited by 53Body Composition Measurement TechniquesClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health Studies

Are basal metabolic rate prediction equations appropriate for female children and adolescents?

Wong, William W., Butte, Nancy F., Hergenroeder, Albert C., Hill, Rebecca B., Stuff, Janice E., Smith, E. O’Brian·1996·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Wong, William W., Nancy F. Butte, Albert C. Hergenroeder, Rebecca B. Hill, Janice E. Stuff, and E. O’Brian Smith. Are basal metabolic rate prediction equations appropriate for female children and adolescents? J. Appl. Physiol. 81(6): 2407–2414, 1996.—The basal metabolic rate (BMR), which accounts for 50–70% of total energy expenditure, is essential for estimation of patient and population energy needs. Numerous equations have been formulated for prediction of human BMR. Most equations in current use are based on measurements of Caucasians performed more than four decades ago. We evaluated 10 prediction equations commonly used for estimation of BMR in 76 Caucasian and 42 African-American girls between 8 and 17 yr of age against BMR measured by whole-body calorimetry. The majority of the prediction equations (9 of 10) overestimated BMR by 60 ± 46 kcal/day (range, 15–176 kcal/day). This overestimation was found to be significantly greater ( P < 0.05) for African-Americans (77 ± 17 kcal/day) than for Caucasians (25 ± 17 kcal/day) in six equations, controlling for age, weight, and sexual maturity. We conclude that ethnicity is an important factor in estimation of the BMR and that the current prediction equations are not appropriate for accurate estimation of the BMR of individual female children and adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1996.81.6.2407

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The subjects from whom the BMR database was assembled had a different body composition to that seen today.

    “It is increasingly clear that the subjects from whom the BMR database (originally from data gathered over 80-90 years ago) was assembled had a different body composition to that seen today (Norgan) 61 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, W. W., Butte, N. F., Hergenroeder, A. C., Hill, R. B., Stuff, J. E., & Smith, E. O.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1996-12-01
Volume
81
Issue
6
Pages
2407-2414
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2117533746
Cited by
53
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
basal metabolic rate, energy expenditure, African American girls, ethnicity, whole-body calorimetry, sexual maturity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Basal Metabolism, Black or African American, Child, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Black People, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review