Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 307

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Age and gender dependency of baroreflex sensitivity in healthy subjects

Laitinen, Tomi, Hartikainen, Juha, Vanninen, Esko, Niskanen, Leo, Geelen, Ghislaine, Länsimies, Esko·1998·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Laitinen, Tomi, Juha Hartikainen, Esko Vanninen, Leo Niskanen, Ghislaine Geelen, and Esko Länsimies. Age and gender dependency of baroreflex sensitivity in healthy subjects. J. Appl. Physiol. 84(2): 576–583, 1998.—We evaluated the correlates of baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) in healthy subjects. The study consisted of 117 healthy, normal-weight, nonsmoking male and female subjects aged 23–77 yr. Baroreflex control of heart rate was measured by using the phenylephrine bolus-injection technique. Frequency- and time-domain analysis of heart rate variability and an exercise test were performed. Plasma norepinephrine, epinephrine, insulin, and arginine vasopressin concentrations and plasma renin activity were measured. In the univariate analysis, BRS correlated with age ( r = −0.65, P < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure ( r = −0.47, P < 0.001), exercise capacity ( r = 0.60, P < 0.001), and the high-frequency component of heart rate variability ( r= 0.64, P < 0.001). There was also a significant correlation between BRS and plasma norepinephrine concentration ( r = −0.22, P < 0.05) and plasma renin activity ( r = 0.32, P < 0.001). According to the multivariate analysis, age and gender were the most important physiological correlates of BRS. They accounted for 52% of interindividual BRS variation. In addition, diastolic blood pressure and high-frequency component of heart rate variability were significant independent correlates of BRS. BRS was significantly higher in men than in women (15.0 ± 1.2 vs. 10.2 ± 1.1 ms/mmHg, respectively; P < 0.01). Twenty-four percent of women >40 yr old and 18% of men >60 yr old had markedly depressed BRS (<3 ms/mmHg). We conclude that physiological factors, particularly age and gender, have significant impact on BRS in healthy subjects. In addition, we demonstrate that BRS values that have been proposed to be useful in identifying postinfarction patients at high risk of sudden death are frequently found in healthy subjects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1998.84.2.576

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 307

Metadata

Authors
Laitinen, T., Hartikainen, J., Vanninen, E., Niskanen, L., Geelen, G., & Länsimies, E.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1998-02-01
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
576-583
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W1863048352
Cited by
307
References
27
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age and gender dependency of baroreflex sensitivity in healthy subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.1998.84.2.576
The paper
Laitinen, T., Hartikainen, J., Vanninen, E., Niskanen, L., Geelen, G., & Länsimies, E. (1998). Age and gender dependency of baroreflex sensitivity in healthy subjects. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1998.84.2.576

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.