Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sex-Related Differences in Autonomic Modulation of Heart Rate in Middle-aged Subjects

Huikuri, Heikki V., Pikkuja¨msa¨, Sirkku M., Airaksinen, K.E. Juhani, Ika¨heimo, Markku J., Rantala, Asko O., Kauma, Heikki, Lilja, Mauno, Kesa¨niemi, Y. Antero·1996·Circulation

Abstract

Background Women have worse outcomes when they experience acute myocardial infarction (MI), but the reasons for this sex-related difference are not well understood. Because cardiovascular neural regulation plays an important role in cardiac mortality, we studied possible sex-related differences in the autonomic modulation of heart rate (HR) in middle-aged subjects without known heart disease. Methods and Results Baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and HR variability were studied in randomly selected, age-matched populations of middle-aged women (n=186; mean age, 50±6 years) and men (n=188; mean age, 50±6 years) without hypertension, diabetes, or clinical or echocardiographic evidence of heart disease. BRS measured from the overshoot phase of the Valsalva maneuver was significantly lower in women (8.0±4.6 ms/mm Hg, n=152) than in men (10.5±4.6 ms/mm Hg, n=151) ( P <.001), and the low-frequency component of HR variability measured from ECG recordings also was lower in women ( P <.001), whereas the high-frequency component was higher in women than in men ( P <.001). The ratio between the low- and high-frequency oscillations also was lower in the women ( P <.001). The increase of HR and decrease of high-frequency component of HR variability in response to an upright posture were smaller in magnitude in women than in men ( P <.01 for both). After adjustment for differences in the baseline variables, such as blood pressure, HR, smoking, alcohol consumption, and psychosocial score, the sex-related differences in BRS and HR variability still remained significant ( P <.001 for all). Women with estrogen replacement therapy (n=46) had significantly higher BRS and total HR variance than the age-matched women without hormone treatment ( P <.01 for both), and the BRS and HR variability of the women with estrogen therapy did not differ from those of the age-matched men. Conclusions Baroreflex responsiveness is attenuated in middle-aged women compared with men, but the tonic vagal modulation of HR is augmented. Hormone replacement therapy appears to have favorable effects on the cardiovascular autonomic regulation in postmenopausal women.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.94.2.122

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
Huikuri, H. V., Pikkuja¨msa¨, S. M., Airaksinen, K. E. J., Ika¨heimo, M. J., Rantala, A. O., Kauma, H., Lilja, M., & Kesa¨niemi, Y. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
1996-07-15
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
122-125
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2002245125
Cited by
447
References
16
FWCI
11.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex-Related Differences in Autonomic Modulation of Heart Rate in Middle-aged Subjects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.94.2.122
The paper
Huikuri, H. V., Pikkuja¨msa¨, S. M., Airaksinen, K. E. J., Ika¨heimo, M. J., Rantala, A. O., Kauma, H., Lilja, M., & Kesa¨niemi, Y. A. (1996). Sex-Related Differences in Autonomic Modulation of Heart Rate in Middle-aged Subjects. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.2.122

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.