The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age causes a redistribution of joint torques and powers during gait
Abstract
At self-selected walking speeds, elderly compared with young adults generate decreased joint torques and powers in the lower extremity. These differences may be actual gait-limiting factors and neuromuscular adaptations with age or simply a consciously selected motor pattern to produce a slower gait. The purpose of the study was to compare joint torques and powers of young and elderly adults walking at the same speed. Twelve elderly and fourteen young adults (ages 69 and 21 yr) walked at 1.48 m/s over a force platform while being videotaped. Hip, knee, and ankle torques and powers were calculated from the reaction force and kinematic data. A support torque was calculated as the sum of the three joint torques. Extensor angular impulse during stance and positive work at each joint were derived from the torques and powers. Step length was 4% shorter and cadence was 4% higher in elderly adults (both P < 0.05) compared with young adults. Support angular impulse was nearly identical between groups, but elderly adults had 58% greater angular impulse and 279% more work at the hip, 50% less angular impulse and 39% less work at the knee, and 23% less angular impulse and 29% less work at the ankle compared with young adults ( t-test, all P < 0.05). Age caused a redistribution of joint torques and powers, with the elderly using their hip extensors more and their knee extensors and ankle plantar flexors less than young adults when walking at the same speed. Along with a reduction in motor and sensory functions, the natural history of aging causes a shift in the locus of function in motor performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: effects of age, gender, and ethnicity
Gallagher, D., Visser, M., De Meersman, R. E., Sepúlveda, D., Baumgartner, R. N., Pierson, R. N., Harris, T., & Heymsfield, S. B. (1997) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1997.83.1.229 · Cited by 966
Cited by
Schmitz, A., Silder, A., Heiderscheit, B., Mahoney, J., & Thelen, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2008.10.008 · Cited by 347
Hortobágyi, T., Lesinski, M., Gäbler, M., VanSwearingen, J. M., Malatesta, D., & Granacher, U. (2015) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-015-0371-2 · Cited by 204
Self-citationDen Otter, A. R., Geurts, A. C. H., Mulder, T., & Duysens, J. (2006) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2005.08.014 · Cited by 177
The Consequences of Resistance Training for Movement Control in Older Adults
Barry, B. K., & Carson, R. G. (2004) · The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences · doi:10.1093/gerona/59.7.m730 · Cited by 169
Neuromuscular determinants of maximum walking speed in well-functioning older adults
Clark, D. J., Manini, T. M., Fielding, R. A., & Patten, C. (2013) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2013.01.010 · Cited by 133
Metadata
- Authors
- DeVita, P., & Hortobagyi, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1804-1811
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2138594538
- Cited by
- 737
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age causes a redistribution of joint torques and powers during gait. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jappl.2000.88.5.1804
- The paper
- DeVita, P., & Hortobagyi, T. (2000). Age causes a redistribution of joint torques and powers during gait. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.88.5.1804
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.