Cited by 61Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingLower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

Ambulatory estimates of maximal aerobic power from foot -ground contact times and heart rates in running humans

Weyand, Peter G., Kelly, Maureen, Blackadar, Thomas, Darley, Jesse C., Oliver, Steven R., Ohlenbusch, Norbert E., Joffe, Sam W., Hoyt, Reed W.·2001·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Seeking to develop a simple ambulatory test of maximal aerobic power (V˙o 2 max), we hypothesized that the ratio of inverse foot-ground contact time (1/ t c) to heart rate (HR) during steady-speed running would accurately predictV˙o 2 max. Given the direct relationship between 1/ t c and mass-specific O 2 uptake during running, the ratio 1/ t c· HR should reflect mass-specific O 2 pulse and, in turn, aerobic power. We divided 36 volunteers into matched experimental and validation groups.V˙o 2 max was determined by a treadmill test to volitional fatigue. Ambulatory monitors on the shoe and chest recorded foot-ground contact time ( t c) and steady-state HR, respectively, at a series of submaximal running speeds. In the experimental group, aerobic fitness index (1/ t c· HR) was nearly constant across running speed and correlated withV˙o 2 max( r = 0.90). The regression equation derived from data from the experimental group predicted V˙o 2 max from the 1/ t c· HR values in the validation group within 8.3% and 4.7 ml O 2· kg−1· min−1( r = 0.84) of measured values. We conclude that simultaneous measurements of foot-ground constant times and heart rates during level running at a freely chosen constant speed can provide accurate estimates of maximal aerobic power.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.1.451

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weyand, P. G., Kelly, M., Blackadar, T., Darley, J. C., Oliver, S. R., Ohlenbusch, N. E., Joffe, S. W., & Hoyt, R. W.
Affiliations
  • U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (US)
  • FitSense Technology Incorporated, Wellesley 02481; and
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2001-07-01
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
451-458
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2112800069
Cited by
61
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Keywords
maximal aerobic capacity, heart rate, running, oxygen consumption, wearable sensors
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Adult, Female, Foot, Forecasting, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Models, Biological, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Fitness, Running, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review