The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Probing the human vestibular system with galvanic stimulation
Abstract
Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is a simple, safe, and specific way to elicit vestibular reflexes. Yet, despite a long history, it has only recently found popularity as a research tool and is rarely used clinically. The obstacle to advancing and exploiting GVS is that we cannot interpret the evoked responses with certainty because we do not understand how the stimulus acts as an input to the system. This paper examines the electrophysiology and anatomy of the vestibular organs and the effects of GVS on human balance control and develops a model that explains the observed balance responses. These responses are large and highly organized over all body segments and adapt to postural and balance requirements. To achieve this, neurons in the vestibular nuclei receive convergent signals from all vestibular receptors and somatosensory and cortical inputs. GVS sway responses are affected by other sources of information about balance but can appear as the sum of otolithic and semicircular canal responses. Electrophysiological studies showing similar activation of primary afferents from the otolith organs and canals and their convergence in the vestibular nuclei support this. On the basis of the morphology of the cristae and the alignment of the semicircular canals in the skull, rotational vectors calculated for every mode of GVS agree with the observed sway. However, vector summation of signals from all utricular afferents does not explain the observed sway. Thus we propose the hypothesis that the otolithic component of the balance response originates from only the pars medialis of the utricular macula.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008
Nitsche, M. A., Cohen, L. G., Wassermann, E. M., Priori, A., Lang, N., Antal, A., Paulus, W., Hummel, F., Boggio, P. S., Fregni, F., et al. (2008) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004 · Cited by 3,057
“Specifically, electrodes above the mastoids, which are used for galvanic stimulation of the vestibular system, might induce nausea.(51) Because tDCS neither causes epileptic seizures nor reduces the seizure threshold in animals,(52) seizures do not appear to be a risk for healthy subjects.”
BackgroundVestibular evoked myogenic potentials: Past, present and future
Rosengren, S. M., Welgampola, M. S., & Colebatch, J. G. (2010) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.10.016 · Cited by 580
Body ownership and embodiment: vestibular and multisensory mechanisms
Lopez, C., Halje, P., & Blanke, O. (2008) · Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2007.12.006 · Cited by 270
Day, B. L., & Fitzpatrick, R. C. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.053 · Cited by 169
Self-citationVestibulo‐Sympathetic Responses
Yates, B. J., Bolton, P. S., & Macefield, V. G. (2014) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c130041 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Fitzpatrick, R. C., & Day, B. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2301-2316
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W1990929336
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probing the human vestibular system with galvanic stimulation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2004
- The paper
- Fitzpatrick, R. C., & Day, B. L. (2004). Probing the human vestibular system with galvanic stimulation. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.