Cited by 8Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Effect of a neck compression collar on cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular function in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS)

Nardone, Massimo, Guzman, Juan, Harvey, Paula J., Floras, John S., Edgell, Heather·2020·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is accompanied by reduced brain blood flow, autonomic dysfunction, and orthostatic intolerance. We hypothesized that wearing a neck compression collar would attenuate orthostatic symptoms, increase brain blood flow, and influence autonomic reflexes. Ten participants with POTS (9 women, age: 36 ± 10) underwent two trials of supine rest, paced deep breathing (6 breaths/min), Valsalva maneuver (40 mmHg for 15 s), and 70° upright tilt. For one trial, participants wore a neck compression device (Q30 Innovations). Blood pressure, heart rate (HR), brain blood flow velocity, stroke volume, respiratory rate, and end-tidal gases were continuously measured. The Vanderbilt Orthostatic Symptom Score was compiled at the end of tilt. The use of the collar reduced the orthostatic symptom score of participants with POTS during upright tilt (26.9 ± 12.5 to 18.7 ± 13.1, P = 0.04). Collar compression in the supine condition reduced the low-frequency domain of HR variability (60 ± 18 to 51 ± 23 normalized units, P = 0.04) and increased the change in HR (15 ± 5 to 17 ± 6 bpm, P = 0.02) and E:I ratio (1.2 ± 0.1 to 1.3 ± 0.1, P = 0.01) during paced deep breathing. Throughout tilt, wearing the collar reduced respiratory rate (baseline: 13 ± 3 to 12 ± 4 breath/min; tilt: 18 ± 5 to 15 ± 5 breath/min; main effect of collar P = 0.048), end-tidal oxygen (baseline: 115 ± 5 to 112 ± 5 mmHg; tilt: 122 ± 10 to 118 ± 11 mmHg; main effect of collar P = 0.026). In…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00040.2020

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nardone, M., Guzman, J., Harvey, P. J., Floras, J. S., & Edgell, H.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Edgell, Heather
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2020-04-01
Volume
128
Issue
4
Pages
907-913
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W3010671013
Cited by
8
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Standing up to POTS
  • Q30 Innovations
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
orthostatic intolerance, cerebral blood flow, autonomic dysfunction, heart rate variability, respiratory rate, Valsalva maneuver, upright tilt, orthostatic symptoms, cerebrovascular function, cardiopulmonary function, end-tidal oxygen, autonomic reflexes
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Middle Aged, Tachycardia, Valsalva Maneuver, Tilt-Table Test, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review