Cited by 361Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsPhysical Activity and HealthArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

An artificial neural network to estimate physical activity energy expenditure and identify physical activity type from an accelerometer

Open access
Staudenmayer, John, Pober, David, Crouter, Scott, Bassett, David, Freedson, Patty·2009·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to develop and test two artificial neural networks (ANN) to apply to physical activity data collected with a commonly used uniaxial accelerometer. The first ANN model estimated physical activity metabolic equivalents (METs), and the second ANN identified activity type. Subjects ( n = 24 men and 24 women, mean age = 35 yr) completed a menu of activities that included sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous intensities, and each activity was performed for 10 min. There were three different activity menus, and 20 participants completed each menu. Oxygen consumption (in ml·kg −1 ·min −1 ) was measured continuously, and the average of minutes 4–9 was used to represent the oxygen cost of each activity. To calculate METs, activity oxygen consumption was divided by 3.5 ml·kg −1 ·min −1 (1 MET). Accelerometer data were collected second by second using the Actigraph model 7164. For the analysis, we used the distribution of counts (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles of a minute's second-by-second counts) and temporal dynamics of counts (lag, one autocorrelation) as the accelerometer feature inputs to the ANN. To examine model performance, we used the leave-one-out cross-validation technique. The ANN prediction of METs root-mean-squared error was 1.22 METs (confidence interval: 1.14–1.30). For the prediction of activity type, the ANN correctly classified activity type 88.8% of the time (confidence interval: 86.4–91.2%). Activity types were low-level activities, locomotion, vigorous sports, and household activities/other activities. This novel approach of applying ANNs for processing Actigraph accelerometer data is promising and shows that we can successfully estimate activity METs and identify activity type using ANN analytic procedures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00465.2009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 361

Authors
Staudenmayer, J., Pober, D., Crouter, S., Bassett, D., & Freedson, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • Lyndon State College (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
  • University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Corresponding author
Staudenmayer, John
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2009-10
Volume
107
Issue
4
Pages
1300-1307
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2164041372
Cited by
361
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 23
FWCI
24.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA121005)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
physical activity energy expenditure, metabolic equivalents, activity classification, accelerometer, ActiGraph, artificial neural networks, oxygen consumption, physical activity intensity
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Adult, Aged, Calorimetry, Indirect, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Oxygen Consumption, Regression Analysis, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise, Neural Networks, Computer, Nonlinear Dynamics, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review