Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Acute ultraviolet radiation exposure attenuates nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in the cutaneous microvasculature of healthy humans

Wolf, S. Tony, Stanhewicz, Anna E., Jablonski, Nina G., Kenney, W. Larry·2018·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

5-Methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) is important for nitric oxide (NO)-mediated cutaneous microvascular vasodilation. Ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation may deplete 5-MTHF, either directly or via production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), decreasing NO-mediated vasodilation. We hypothesized that 1) acute UVB exposure would attenuate NO-dependent cutaneous vasodilation, 2) local perfusion of 5-MTHF or ascorbate (ASC) (antioxidant) would augment NO-dependent vasodilation after UVB, and 3) darker skin pigmentation would be UVB-protective. Intradermal microdialysis fibers ( n = 3) placed in each forearm of 22 healthy young adults (23 ± 1 yr; 8M/14F) locally delivered lactated Ringer’s (control), 5 mM 5-MTHF, or 10 mM ASC. One arm was UVB-exposed (300 mJ/cm 2 ), and the other served as a nonexposed control (CON). Following UVB exposure, a standardized local heating (42°C) protocol induced cutaneous vasodilation. After attaining a plateau blood flow, 15 mM N G -nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (nitric oxide synthase inhibiter) was infused at all sites to quantify the NO contribution. Red cell flux was measured at each site by laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF), and cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC = LDF/mean arterial pressure) was expressed as a percentage of maximum (28 mM sodium nitroprusside + 43°C). UVB attenuated NO-mediated vasodilation compared with CON (23.1 ± 3.6 vs. 33.9 ± 3.4%; P = 0.001). Delivery of 5-MTHF or ASC improved NO-mediated vasodilation versus lactated Ringer’s in the UVB-exposed arm (MTHF: 30.1 ± 4.8% vs. 23.1 ± 3.8%; P = 0.03; ASC: 30.9 ± 4.3% vs. 23.1 ± 3.8%; P = 0.02). Neither treatment affected the response in the nonexposed arm ( P ≥ 0.09). Skin pigmentation (melanin index) was not predictive of the UVB response ( P ≥ 0.34). These data suggest that acute UVB exposure attenuates NO-mediated vasodilation via direct and/or ROS-induced reductions in 5-MTHF, independent of skin pigmentation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Endothelial-derived nitric oxide (NO) contributes to normal healthy function of the human cutaneous microvasculature. Bioavailability of 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MTHF) is important for the production of NO. Ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure, specifically UVB, may deplete cutaneous 5-MTHF, thereby reducing NO-mediated microvascular function. Our findings suggest that acute UVB exposure attenuates NO-mediated vasodilation of the cutaneous microvasculature via degradation of 5-MTHF. These findings advance our understanding of the potential negative health impacts of acute UV exposure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.00501.2018

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1152/ajpregu.00448.2012 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12479191 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1152/japplphysiol.01354.2011 · DOI
  4. 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.236398 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.abb.2006.12.017 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.niox.2011.04.004 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/lsm.20239 · DOI
  8. 10.1159/000051543 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.6256855 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.212100 · DOI
  11. 10.1113/EP086776 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.1475-097X.1986.tb00239.x · DOI
  13. 10.2340/00015555-2269 · DOI
  14. 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.3.824 · DOI
  15. 10.1152/jappl.1999.86.4.1185 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00589.2017 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.mvr.2018.02.001 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/ajhb.22929 · DOI
  19. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00414.2010 · DOI
  20. 10.1152/jappl.2001.91.4.1619 · DOI
  21. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00229.2002 · DOI
  22. 10.1096/fj.11-195859 · DOI
  23. 10.1097/00005768-200108000-00021 · DOI
  24. 10.1159/000018428 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2005.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1053/sper.2002.34773 · DOI
  27. 10.1039/C3PP50348H · DOI
  28. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.178129 · DOI
  29. 10.1017/S0007114516002579 · DOI
  30. 10.1042/CS20140821 · DOI
  31. 10.1152/ajpregu.00269.2014 · DOI
  32. 10.1093/nutrit/nuw053 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2006.tb09826.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2008.12.003 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wolf, S. T., Stanhewicz, A. E., Jablonski, N. G., & Kenney, W. L.
Affiliations
  • Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
  • Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2018-10-01
Volume
125
Issue
4
Pages
1232-1237
ISSN
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
Cited by
19
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review