The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pulmonary O2uptake kinetics as a determinant of high-intensity exercise tolerance in humans
Abstract
Tolerance to high-intensity constant-power (P) exercise is well described by a hyperbola with two parameters: a curvature constant (W′) and power asymptote termed “critical power” (CP). Since the ability to sustain exercise is closely related to the ability to meet the ATP demand in a steady state, we reasoned that pulmonary O 2 uptake (V̇o 2) kinetics would relate to the P-tolerable duration (t lim) parameters. We hypothesized that 1) the fundamental time constant (τV̇o 2) would relate inversely to CP; and 2) the slow-component magnitude (ΔV̇o 2sc) would relate directly to W′. Fourteen healthy men performed cycle ergometry protocols to the limit of tolerance: 1) an incremental ramp test; 2) a series of constant-P tests to determine V̇o 2max, CP, and W′; and 3) repeated constant-P tests (WR 6) normalized to a 6 min t lim for τV̇o 2 and ΔV̇o 2sc estimation. The WR 6 t lim averaged 365 ± 16 s, and V̇o 2max(4.18 ± 0.49 l/min) was achieved in every case. CP (range: 171–294 W) was inversely correlated with τV̇o 2(18–38 s; R 2= 0.90), and W′ (12.8–29.9 kJ) was directly correlated with ΔV̇o 2sc(0.42–0.96 l/min; R 2= 0.76). These findings support the notions that 1) rapid V̇o 2 adaptation at exercise onset allows a steady state to be achieved at higher work rates compared with when V̇o 2 kinetics are slower; and 2) exercise exceeding this limit initiates a “fatigue cascade” linking W′ to a progressive increase in the O 2 cost of power production (V̇o 2sc), which, if continued, results in attainment of V̇o 2max and exercise intolerance. Collectively, these data implicate V̇o 2 kinetics as a key determinant of high-intensity exercise tolerance in humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The maximal metabolic steady state: redefining the ‘gold standard’
Jones, A. M., Burnley, M., Black, M. I., Poole, D. C., & Vanhatalo, A. (2019) · Physiological Reports · doi:10.14814/phy2.14098 · Cited by 298
Jones, A. M., & Vanhatalo, A. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-017-0688-0 · Cited by 259
Identification of Non-Invasive Exercise Thresholds: Methods, Strategies, and an Online App
Keir, D. A., Iannetta, D., Mattioni Maturana, F., Kowalchuk, J. M., & Murias, J. M. (2022) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-021-01581-z · Cited by 193
Effects of Nitrate on the Power–Duration Relationship for Severe-Intensity Exercise
KELLY, J., VANHATALO, A., WILKERSON, D. P., WYLIE, L. J., & JONES, A. M. (2013) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31828e885c · Cited by 87
Clark, I. E., Vanhatalo, A., Thompson, C., Joseph, C., Black, M. I., Blackwell, J. R., Wylie, L. J., Tan, R., Bailey, S. J., Wilkins, B. W., et al. (2019) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00207.2019 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Murgatroyd, S. R., Ferguson, C., Ward, S. A., Whipp, B. J., & Rossiter, H. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2011-06
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1598-1606
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2160724276
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulmonary O2uptake kinetics as a determinant of high-intensity exercise tolerance in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/japplphysiol.01092.2010
- The paper
- Murgatroyd, S. R., Ferguson, C., Ward, S. A., Whipp, B. J., & Rossiter, H. B. (2011). Pulmonary O2uptake kinetics as a determinant of high-intensity exercise tolerance in humans. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01092.2010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.