CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 304Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyExercise and Physiological Responses

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Time course of performance changes and fatigue markers during intensified training in trained cyclists

Open access
Halson, Shona L., Bridge, Matthew W., Meeusen, Romain, Busschaert, Bart, Gleeson, Michael, Jones, David A., Jeukendrup, Asker E.·2002·Journal of Applied Physiology
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.01164.2001
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

To study the cumulative effects of exercise stress and subsequent recovery on performance changes and fatigue indicators, the training of eight endurance cyclists was systematically controlled and monitored for a 6-wk period. Subjects completed 2 wk of normal (N), intensified (ITP), and recovery training. A significant decline in maximal power output (N = 338 ± 17 W, ITP = 319 ± 17 W) and a significant increase in time to complete a simulated time trial (N = 59.4 ± 1.9 min, ITP = 65.3 ± 2.6 min) occurred after ITP in conjunction with a 29% increase in global mood disturbance. The decline in performance was associated with a 9.3% reduction in maximal heart rate, a 5% reduction in maximal oxygen uptake, and an 8.6% increase in perception of effort. Despite the large reductions in performance, no changes were observed in substrate utilization, cycling efficiency, and lactate, plasma urea, ammonia, and catecholamine concentrations. These findings indicate that a state of overreaching can already be induced after 7 days of intensified training with limited recovery.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.01164.2001

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Fry RW, 1992, Can J Sport Sci, 17, 241
  2. Hooper S, 1997, Int J Sport Psychol, 28, 1
  3. Lehmann MJ, 1997, J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 37, 7
  4. Stone MH, 1991, J Appl Sport Sci Res, 5, 35

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 304

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Halson, S. L., Bridge, M. W., Meeusen, R., Busschaert, B., Gleeson, M., Jones, D. A., & Jeukendrup, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
947-956
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
DOI
10.1152/japplphysiol.01164.2001
OpenAlex
W2163199203
Cited by
304
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
intensified training, overtraining, fatigue markers, endurance cyclists, maximum power, time trial performance, mood disturbance, maximal heart rate, VO2max, perceived exertion, substrate utilization, cycling efficiency, lactate, serum urea, catecholamines, recovery training, training stress
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Bicycling, Exercise Test, Physical Exertion, Fatigue, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Education and Training, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Time Factors, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review