The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals
Abstract
The goal of this study was to compare treadmill walking with overground walking in healthy subjects with no known gait disorders. Nineteen subjects were tested, where each subject walked on a split-belt instrumented treadmill as well as over a smooth, flat surface. Comparisons between walking conditions were made for temporal gait parameters such as step length and cadence, leg kinematics, joint moments and powers, and muscle activity. Overall, very few differences were found in temporal gait parameters or leg kinematics between treadmill and overground walking. Conversely, sagittal plane joint moments were found to be quite different, where during treadmill walking trials, subjects demonstrated less dorsiflexor moments, less knee extensor moments, and greater hip extensor moments. Joint powers in the sagittal plane were found to be similar at the ankle but quite different at the knee and hip joints. Differences in muscle activity were observed between the two walking modalities, particularly in the tibialis anterior throughout stance, and in the hamstrings, vastus medialis and adductor longus during swing. While differences were observed in muscle activation patterns, joint moments and joint powers between the two walking modalities, the overall patterns in these behaviors were quite similar. From a therapeutic perspective, this suggests that training individuals with neurological injuries on a treadmill appears to be justified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke
Hidler, J., Nichols, D., Pelliccio, M., Brady, K., Campbell, D. D., Kahn, J. H., & Hornby, T. G. (2009) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968308326632 · Cited by 652
Self-citationA Review on Lower Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Robots
Shi, D., Zhang, W., Zhang, W., & Ding, X. (2019) · Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.1186/s10033-019-0389-8 · Cited by 508
The OU-ISIR Gait Database Comprising the Treadmill Dataset
Makihara, Y., Mannami, H., Tsuji, A., Hossain, M. A., Sugiura, K., Mori, A., & Yagi, Y. (2012) · IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications · doi:10.2197/ipsjtcva.4.53 · Cited by 237
Vemulapalli, S., Dolor, R. J., Hasselblad, V., Schmit, K., Banks, A., Heidenfelder, B., Patel, M. R., & Jones, W. S. (2015) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2015.03.009 · Cited by 77
Vanroy, C., Vissers, D., Cras, P., Beyne, S., Feys, H., Vanlandewijck, Y., & Truijen, S. (2014) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2013.859307 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, S. J., & Hidler, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 747-755
- ISSN
- 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- OpenAlex
- W2143100308
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/japplphysiol.01380.2006
- The paper
- Lee, S. J., & Hidler, J. (2008). Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals. Journal of Applied Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01380.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.