Cited by 46Physical Activity and HealthStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Physical activity monitoring in stroke: SenseWear Pro2 Activity accelerometer versus Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200 Pedometer

Vanroy, Christel, Vissers, Dirk, Cras, Patrick, Beyne, Saskia, Feys, Hilde, Vanlandewijck, Yves, Truijen, Steven·2014·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: Determine validity and reliability of SenseWear Pro2 Armband (SWP2A) and Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200 Pedometer (YDWP) in stroke and healthy adults. METHODS: Fifteen stroke patients and 15 healthy participants wore SWP2A on upper arm and YDWP at hip/knee. Different activities were performed: treadmill walking, walking up/down a step, cycling and walking on an even surface. Steps and Energy Expenditure (EE) were measured and compared to steps counted manually and indirect calorimetry. Repeated measurements were compared to determine reliability of both devices. RESULTS: Spearman correlation coefficients between knee-worn YDWP and counted steps while walking on an even surface was ≥0.89 in healthy and ≥0.95 in stroke. Treadmill walking revealed high Spearman correlation coefficients in healthy individuals (rs ≥ 0.90) and at 1.5 km/h in stroke (rs = 0.69). During other activities YDWP often underestimated steps. SWP2A data revealed inconsistent results in EE and steps. Reliability tested by repeated measurements varied between 0.66 and 0.98 for YDWP and 0.61 and 0.97 for SWP2A. CONCLUSION: YDWP and SWP2A are both reliable. Only knee-worn YDWP is a valid device to measure steps except high intensity walking in stroke. YDWP systematically undercounts steps during other activities of short duration. This study could not demonstrate valid measurement of steps/EE in stroke using SWP2A. Implications for Rehabilitation Stroke is a disabling disease with residual neurologic deficits, which impairs mobility and predisposes them to sedentary behavior. A Yamax Digi-Walker SW-200 knee-worn pedometer showed to be a valid and reliable technique to measure ambulatory activity in stroke. A valid instrument to measure energy expenditure in stroke needs to be explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638288.2013.859307

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vanroy, C., Vissers, D., Cras, P., Beyne, S., Feys, H., Vanlandewijck, Y., & Truijen, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Vanroy, Christel
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2013-11-27
Volume
36
Issue
20
Pages
1695-1703
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2056656905
Cited by
46
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universiteit Antwerpen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
stroke, physical activity monitoring, accelerometer, pedometers, step counting, energy expenditure, validity, reliability statistics, ambulatory activity, treadmill walking, sedentary behavior
MeSH terms
Calorimetry, Indirect, Disability Evaluation, Energy Metabolism, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reproducibility of Results, Case-Control Studies, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Gait Disorders, Neurologic, Stroke, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review