The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interlimb Coordination During Locomotion: What Can be Adapted and Stored?
Abstract
Interlimb coordination is critically important during bipedal locomotion and often must be adapted to account for varying environmental circumstances. Here we studied adaptation of human interlimb coordination using a split-belt treadmill, where the legs can be made to move at different speeds. Human adults, infants, and spinal cats can alter walking patterns on a split-belt treadmill by prolonging stance and shortening swing on the slower limb and vice versa on the faster limb. It is not known whether other locomotor parameters change or if there is a capacity for storage of a new motor pattern after training. We asked whether adults adapt both intra- and interlimb gait parameters during split-belt walking and show aftereffects from training. Healthy subjects were tested walking with belts tied (baseline), then belts split (adaptation), and again tied (postadaptation). Walking parameters that directly relate to the interlimb relationship changed slowly during adaptation and showed robust aftereffects during postadaptation. These changes paralleled subjective impressions of limping versus no limping. In contrast, parameters calculated from an individual leg changed rapidly to accommodate split-belts and showed no aftereffects. These results suggest some independence of neural control of intra- versus interlimb parameters during walking. They also show that the adult nervous system can adapt and store new interlimb patterns after short bouts of training. The differences in intra- versus interlimb control may be related to the varying complexity of the parameters, task demands, and/or the level of neural control necessary for their adaptation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smith, M. A., & Shadmehr, R. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00943.2004 · Cited by 497
Maschke, M., Gomez, C. M., Ebner, T. J., & Konczak, J. (2004) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00557.2003 · Cited by 258
Cited by
Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching
Tseng, Y.-W., Diedrichsen, J., Krakauer, J. W., Shadmehr, R., & Bastian, A. J. (2007) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00266.2007 · Cited by 883
Self-citationCerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking
Morton, S. M., & Bastian, A. J. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2622-06.2006 · Cited by 619
Self-citationHumans can continuously optimize energetic cost during walking
Selinger, J. C., O’Connor, S. M., Wong, J. D., & Donelan, J. M. (2015) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.016 · Cited by 395
Use-dependent and error-based learning of motor behaviors
Diedrichsen, J., White, O., Newman, D., & Lally, N. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5406-09.2010 · Cited by 376
Adaptation reveals independent control networks for human walking
Choi, J. T., & Bastian, A. J. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1930 · Cited by 344
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Reisman, D. S., Block, H. J., & Bastian, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2403-2415
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2128191380
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interlimb Coordination During Locomotion: What Can be Adapted and Stored? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.00089.2005
- The paper
- Reisman, D. S., Block, H. J., & Bastian, A. J. (2005). Interlimb Coordination During Locomotion: What Can be Adapted and Stored? Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00089.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.