Coding of temporal information by activity-dependent synapses.
Open accessAbstract
Synaptic transmission in the neocortex is dynamic, such that the magnitude of the postsynaptic response changes with the history of the presynaptic activity. Therefore each response carries information about the temporal structure of the preceding presynaptic input spike train. We quantitatively analyze the information about previous interspike intervals, contained in single responses of dynamic synapses, using methods from information theory applied to experimentally based deterministic and probabilistic phenomenological models of depressing and facilitating synapses. We show that for any given dynamic synapse, there exists an optimal frequency of presynaptic spike firing for which the information content is maximal; simple relations between this optimal frequency and the synaptic parameters are derived. Depressing neocortical synapses are optimized for coding temporal information at low firing rates of 0.5-5 Hz, typical to the spontaneous activity of cortical neurons, and carry significant information about the timing of up to four preceding presynaptic spikes. Facilitating synapses, however, are optimized to code information at higher presynaptic rates of 9-70 Hz and can represent the timing of over eight presynaptic spikes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The role of synapses as processing units of the human brain is reinforced by the results of computational simulation, which indicate that the computational power of a network is increased using dynamic synapses.
“The role of synapses as processing units of the human brain is reinforced by the results of computational simulation, which indicate that the computational power of a network is increased using dynamic synapses.”
From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Fuhrmann et al., 2002
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 53 · Cited by 267
- Authors
- Fuhrmann, G., Segev, I., Markram, H., & Tsodyks, M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Neurobiology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100; and
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 140-148
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1875306972
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- infoscience.epfl.ch
- Locations
- Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- dynamic synapses, synaptic depression, synaptic facilitation, temporal coding, interspike intervals, spike timing, neocortex, information theory, spontaneous cortical activity
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Animals, Computer Simulation, Information Theory, Models, Neurological, Synaptic Transmission, Synapses, Time Factors, Time Perception, Models, Statistical, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review