The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anterior Inferotemporal Neurons of Monkeys Engaged in Object Recognition Can be Highly Sensitive to Object Retinal Position
Abstract
Visual object recognition is computationally difficult because changes in an object's position, distance, pose, or setting may cause it to produce a different retinal image on each encounter. To robustly recognize objects, the primate brain must have mechanisms to compensate for these variations. Although these mechanisms are poorly understood, it is thought that they elaborate neuronal representations in the inferotemporal cortex that are sensitive to object form but substantially invariant to other image variations. This study examines this hypothesis for image variation resulting from changes in object position. We studied the effect of small differences (±1.5°) in the retinal position of small (0.6° wide) visual forms on both the behavior of monkeys trained to identify those forms and the responses of 146 anterior IT (AIT) neurons collected during that behavior. Behavioral accuracy and speed were largely unaffected by these small changes in position. Consistent with previous studies, many AIT responses were highly selective for the forms. However, AIT responses showed far greater sensitivity to retinal position than predicted from their reported receptive field (RF) sizes. The median AIT neuron showed a ∼60% response decrease between positions within ±1.5° of the center of gaze, and 52% of neurons were unresponsive to one or more of these positions. Consistent with previous studies, each neuron's rank order of target preferences was largely unaffected across position changes. Although we have not yet determined the conditions necessary to observe this marked position sensitivity in AIT responses, we rule out effects of spatial-frequency content, eye movements, and failures to include the RF center. To reconcile this observation with previous studies, we hypothesize that either AIT position sensitivity strongly depends on object size or that position sensitivity is sharpened by extensive visual experience at fixed retinal positions or by the presence of flanking distractors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
Biederman, I. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115 · Cited by 5,621
Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/14819 · Cited by 3,309
Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00108-4 · Cited by 963
Olshausen, B., Anderson, C., & Van Essen, D. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-11-04700.1993 · Cited by 908
Responses of Neurons in Inferior Temporal Cortex During Memory-Guided Visual Search
Chelazzi, L., Duncan, J., Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.80.6.2918 · Cited by 726
Learning invariance from transformation sequences
Földiák, P. (1991) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1991.3.2.194 · Cited by 661 · cited 2×
“, Poggio 1990; Wallis and Rolls 1997), including the limited position tolerance of complex cells in V1 (Foldiak 1991).”
BackgroundLearning to see: experience and attention in primary visual cortex
Crist, R. E., Li, W., & Gilbert, C. D. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/87470 · Cited by 364
Physiological Correlates of Perceptual Learning in Monkey V1 and V2
Ghose, G. M., Yang, T., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2002) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00690.2001 · Cited by 310
Self-citation
Cited by
Untangling invariant object recognition
DiCarlo, J. J., & Cox, D. D. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.010 · Cited by 959
Self-citationThe Effect of Perceptual Learning on Neuronal Responses in Monkey Visual Area V4
Yang, T., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2004) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4442-03.2004 · Cited by 427
Self-citationReceptive fields in human visual cortex mapped with surface electrodes
Yoshor, D., Bosking, W. H., Ghose, G. M., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl138 · Cited by 152
Self-citationThe primate amygdala combines information about space and value
Peck, C. J., Lau, B., & Salzman, C. D. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3328 · Cited by 115
McKyton, A., & Zohary, E. (2007) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl027 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- DiCarlo, J. J., & Maunsell, J. H. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3264-3278
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W2155993650
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 4.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anterior Inferotemporal Neurons of Monkeys Engaged in Object Recognition Can be Highly Sensitive to Object Retinal Position. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.00358.2002
- The paper
- DiCarlo, J. J., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2003). Anterior Inferotemporal Neurons of Monkeys Engaged in Object Recognition Can be Highly Sensitive to Object Retinal Position. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00358.2002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.