The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sparsening and Temporal Sharpening of Olfactory Representations in the Honeybee Mushroom Bodies
Open accessAbstract
We explored the transformations accompanying the transmission of odor information from the first-order processing area, the antennal lobe, to the mushroom body, a higher-order integration center in the insect brain. Using Ca 2+ imaging, we recorded activity in the dendrites of the projection neurons that connect the antennal lobe with the mushroom body. Next, we recorded the presynaptic terminals of these projection neurons. Finally, we characterized their postsynaptic partners, the intrinsic neurons of the mushroom body, the clawed Kenyon cells. We found fundamental differences in odor coding between the antennal lobe and the mushroom body. Odors evoked combinatorial activity patterns at all three processing stages, but the spatial patterns became progressively sparser along this path. Projection neuron dendrites and boutons showed similar response profiles, but the boutons were more narrowly tuned to odors. The transmission from projection neuron boutons to Kenyon cells was accompanied by a further sparsening of the population code. Activated Kenyon cells were highly odor specific. Furthermore, the onset of Kenyon cell responses to projection neurons occurred within the first 200 ms and complex temporal patterns were transformed into brief phasic responses. Thus two types of transformations occurred within the MB: sparsening of a combinatorial code, mediated by pre- and postsynaptic processing within the mushroom body microcircuits, and temporal sharpening of postsynaptic Kenyon cell responses, probably involving a broader loop of inhibitory recurrent neurons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex
Hromádka, T., DeWeese, M. R., & Zador, A. M. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060016 · Cited by 579
Behavioral and neural analysis of associative learning in the honeybee: a taste from the magic well
Giurfa, M. (2007) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-007-0235-9 · Cited by 485
The honeybee as a model for understanding the basis of cognition
Menzel, R. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3357 · Cited by 431
Self-citationMushroom Body Output Neurons Encode Odor–Reward Associations
Strube-Bloss, M. F., Nawrot, M. P., & Menzel, R. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2583-10.2011 · Cited by 157
Self-citationAssociative and non-associative plasticity in Kenyon cells of the honeybee mushroom body
Szyszka, P. (2008) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.06.003.2008 · Cited by 121
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Szyszka, P., Ditzen, M., Galkin, A., Galizia, C. G., & Menzel, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurophysiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3303-3313
- ISSN
- 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
- 1522-1598
- OpenAlex
- W1999772767
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sparsening and Temporal Sharpening of Olfactory Representations in the Honeybee Mushroom Bodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1152/jn.00397.2005
- The paper
- Szyszka, P., Ditzen, M., Galkin, A., Galizia, C. G., & Menzel, R. (2005). Sparsening and Temporal Sharpening of Olfactory Representations in the Honeybee Mushroom Bodies. Journal of Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00397.2005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.