Cited by 290Neural dynamics and brain functionstochastic dynamics and bifurcationIon channel regulation and function

Failure of averaging in the construction of a conductance-based neuron model

Golowasch, Jorge, Goldman, Mark S., Abbott, L. F., Marder, Eve·2002·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Parameters for models of biological systems are often obtained by averaging over experimental results from a number of different preparations. To explore the validity of this procedure, we studied the behavior of a conductance-based model neuron with five voltage-dependent conductances. We randomly varied the maximal conductance of each of the active currents in the model and identified sets of maximal conductances that generate bursting neurons that fire a single action potential at the peak of a slow membrane potential depolarization. A model constructed using the means of the maximal conductances of this population is not itself a one-spike burster, but rather fires three action potentials per burst. Averaging fails because the maximal conductances of the population of one-spike bursters lie in a highly concave region of parameter space that does not contain its mean. This demonstrates that averages over multiple samples can fail to characterize a system whose behavior depends on interactions involving a number of highly variable components.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00412.2001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 2-7 fold variations in mRNA expression are captured in computational models with degenerate solutions.

    “and this is captured in computational models with degenerate solutions [18,31-34]”
  • A consequence of degenerate systems is that averaging across individual samples may give results that differ from the behavior of all of the measurements that were used to calculate the means.

    “A consequence of degenerate systems is that averaging across individual samples may give results that differ from the behavior of all of the measurements that were used to calculate the means [33].”
  • A population of single-spike bursting models has similar waveforms but different underlying conductances.

    “Figure 3 shows data from a population of single-spike bursting models with similar waveforms but different underlying conductances.”
  • When a model is built from the mean Na+ conductance and mean K+ conductance from single-spike bursters, the model does not display the phenotype of the individual neurons whose data were used to calculate the means.

    “When a model is built from the mean Na + conductance and mean K + conductance from these single-spike bursters, the model does not display the phenotype of the individual neurons whose data were used to calculate the means.”
  • Whether averaging fails depends on the specifics of the compensations and correlations among the components that can give rise to similar waveforms or outputs.

    “This need not occur, but depends on the specifics of the compensations and correlations among the components that can give rise to the similar waveforms or outputs [33].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Golowasch, J., Goldman, M. S., Abbott, L. F., & Marder, E.
Affiliations
  • Brandeis University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2002-02-01
Volume
87
Issue
2
Pages
1129-1131
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1820338024
Cited by
290
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH 46742)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
Keywords
conductance-based neuron model, maximal conductance, bursting neurons, parameter space, voltage-dependent conductance, action potential firing
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Brachyura, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Potassium, Ganglia, Invertebrate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review